Laserfiche WebLink
' 03 February 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0465 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> 22 COLLECTION OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Water samples were collected from the purged wells using new disposable plastic bailers after <br /> allowing the wells to achieve a minimum 80%recovery of the pre-purge water volume Each water <br /> sample was transferred into three 40-m1 VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a <br /> sample preservative and one 1-liter amber bottle with no sample preservative After collection, the <br /> samples were properly labeled,placed in a chilled container and transported under chain-of-custody <br /> to McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI) for analysis The samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and diesel (TPH-d) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, and <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) and fuel oxygenates methyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether (MTBE), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE), tertiary- <br /> amyl methyl ether (TAME), and tertiary butanol (TBA) in accordance with EPA Method <br /> 8260B <br /> to 30. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> ' 21 November 2002, the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by the laboratory <br /> analytical data <br /> r3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> At the time of the November 2002 sampling event, depths to ground water ranged from 12 27 feet <br /> to 13 29 feet below the tops of the well casings During this monitoring event,the ground water level <br /> in the wells was approximately 8 13 to 8 33 feet below the tops of the well screens, indicating that <br /> ' the wells are screened properly and yield representative shallow ground water samples <br /> Ground water elevations at the site ranged from 9 53 feet below mean sea level(MSL)in wells MW3 <br /> and MW4 to 9 65 feet below MSL in well MW2 (Table 1) The relative ground water elevation at <br /> the site decreased an average of 0 9 feet between the August 2002 and November 2002 monitoring <br /> events <br /> Site ground water flow direction was northeast at an average gradient of 0 001 feet/feet Figure 3 <br /> ' illustrates the contoured ground water elevations as measured on 21 November 2002 <br /> ' Advanced GeoEnwronmental,Inc <br />