Laserfiche WebLink
with the .removed UST' s. The data indicates that either; ( 1 ) an <br /> offsite source exists to the northwest; or (2) , the hydraulic <br /> gradient since installation of the UST' s has been very divergent_ <br /> The data also reveals that a "zero" has been established to the <br /> east and south_ <br /> 5. PLATE III shows lines of equal concentration of TPH as <br /> gasoline; again, the data indicates a possible offsite source to <br /> the northwest. The limits of the plume have been defined to the <br /> east & south, which supports previous work. <br /> COMMENTS= <br /> 1. The highest levels of BTEX & TPH-G continue to be present in <br /> the water beneath MW-1 , which was in a downgradient position only <br /> during the January, 1994 sampling event. MW-33, which is located <br /> closest to the removed UST' s, has also measured significant <br /> levels of BTEX & THPH-G, although it has not been in a down- <br /> gradient position since monitoring began. <br /> 2 Even though there is no direct evidence of an offsite source, <br /> the data obtained to date continues to indicate its' existence. <br /> • The two recently completed monitoring wells have defined the <br /> limits of both soil and groundwater plume to the east & south <br /> Mid--4, in a direct downgradient position, should have measured <br /> gasoline components; it has not done so. <br /> 3. Based upon the results of data from the 5 monitoring wells, <br /> it appears that additional work is required to define the limits <br /> of the soil & groundwater plume to the north and west. It has <br /> been fully defined to the east and south as shown on PLATES II .& <br /> II.I _ Further work in those directions is not warranted. <br /> 4 Until the limits of contamination have been more fully <br /> defined, it is not possible at this time to design an effective <br /> remediation plan. However, because of the shallow depths <br /> involved, and the sandy nature of the sediments, the technology <br /> exists to clean the site. <br /> PROPOSED PLAN FOR FURTHER DEFINITION OF PLUME: <br /> We believe that the most cost-effective method of delineating the <br /> soil & groundwater plume is to place several small diameter <br /> hydraulically or hammer driven soil/water probes to the north & <br /> west of the property. Discrete soil & water samples can be <br /> obtained quickly & at minimal expense Once the limits of <br /> contamination have been delineated, remediation proposals can be <br /> • solicited & cleanup of the property can be started. <br /> We will began soliciting bads for doing the work within the next <br /> 2 <br />