My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0005806
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COUNTRY CLUB
>
1876
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542421
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0005806
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2019 12:18:18 PM
Creation date
6/21/2019 10:21:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005806
RECORD_ID
PR0542421
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0024377
FACILITY_NAME
COUNTRY CLUB BLVD/295950
STREET_NUMBER
1876
STREET_NAME
COUNTRY CLUB
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12319101
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1876 COUNTRY CLUB BLVD
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WESTERN 1386 1-AS I BLAMER S i RLL I <br /> GEO-ENGINEERS WOODI AND CA 95776-6003 <br /> WHE0 - 1h (530) 668-5300, <br /> . CALIF CONTRACI OR#513857 - 1 AX(530)662-0273 <br /> REGIS FERED GEOI OG IS IS wegea mother corn <br /> Mr Michael J Infurna Jr September 27, 1999 <br /> Senior REHS <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> RE Sanchez Property, 1876 Country Club Blvd , Stockton, CA <br /> Dear Mr Infurna <br /> Please find enclosed one copy of the April-June 1999 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Report for the Sanchez Property, 1876 Country Club Blvd , Stockton, CA <br /> The recommendations of the report Include conducting a pump test and an air <br /> sparging;/vapor extraction pilot test The pilot test will utilize several of the existing <br /> monitor wells for air sparging and will require the installation of horizontal piping within <br /> a shallow trench that traverses the soil contamination plume to collect soil vapors <br /> WEGE believes that these tests are necessary to provide an unbiased feasibility study that <br /> will compare the cost effectiveness of the following three remedial technologies for the <br /> site direct excavation with on-site soil treatment, air sparging in conjunction with vapor <br /> extraction, and the injection of oxygen release compounds into the soil contamination <br /> plume <br /> I am in the process of putting together cost estimates that will be submitted to the UST <br /> Cleanup Fund for conducting the two tests and preparing a feasibility study I also intend <br /> to request funds for installing an additional offsite monitor well west of MW1 to further <br /> define the downgradient extent of the groundwater contamination plume <br /> Please let me know if your office has any objections or further suggestions for conducting <br /> these tests and completing a feasibility/cost effectiveness study of the remedial <br /> alternatives <br /> Sincerely, <br /> David T relfall <br /> Western Geo-Engineers <br /> 10 Cc Mr and Mrs Manuel Sanchez <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.