Laserfiche WebLink
at 26 feet bgs The low level soil contamination (2-4 ppm TPH-G) observed in the soil samples <br /> from 30 5 and 40 5 feet bgs may be partially a result of cross contamination from the contaminated <br /> groundwater in the auger through which the samples were collected <br /> The certified analytical laboratory results from the two hydropunch water samples indicate that <br /> groundwater has been impacted at historically lower groundwater elevations than are currently be <br /> measured in the on-site monitor wells Both water samples from THI (THI-WATER 3T-35' and <br /> THI-WATER 43'-45') showed lower TPH-G and benzene concentrations than water samples <br /> collected from nearby monitor well MW1 during the most recent quarterly groundwater monitoring <br /> round MW 1 is screened between 18 and 32 5 feet bgs The concentrations of TPH-G and BTEX <br /> constituents observed in the samples from the three depth intervals are sufficiently different to <br /> suggest that the hydropunch water samples represent true contaminant concentrations at those <br /> depths rather than cross contamination from shallow groundwater that had entered the borehole <br /> prior to sample collection This is further confirmed by the presence of MTBE (a highly soluble <br /> constituent) in the water samples from MWI between 18 and 32 5 feet bgs and THI between 33 <br /> and 35 feet bgs and the absence of MTBE in the water sample collected from THI between 43 and <br /> 45 feet bgs If the groundwater contamination observed in the hydropunch sample from 43-45 feet <br /> bgs in THI were merely an artifact from the leakage of contaminated shallow groundwater into the <br /> hydropunch bailer (through the hollow rods or disturbed soil at the base of the boring) then the <br /> water sample from 43-45 feet bgs should have contained measurable concentrations of MTBE It is <br /> more likely that the gasoline discharges that occurred during historically lower groundwater <br /> elevations did not contain MTBE as an oxygenant <br /> RECOMMENDA'T'IONS <br /> 1) Implement Wm J Hunter & Associates "Workplan for Removing Contaminated Soil" dated <br /> October, 1997 Remove contaminated soil to a depth of 26 feet bgs <br /> 2) Ilistall two additional monitor wells to measure TPH-G, BTEX, and MTBE concentrations at <br /> depths belowthe current monitor well slotted intervals Install one monitor well at the center of <br /> the groundwater contamination plume following removal of contaminated soil to 26 feet bgs <br /> and one well downgradient of shallow groundwater plume Collect hydropunch water samples <br /> during the drilling of tile Boreholes for each monitor W611 at 5 foot intervals below 40 feet bgs <br /> and screen water samples on-site with a portable chromatograph to establish the required total <br /> depth of the monitor wells for measuring historical groundwater contamination Complete the <br /> two monitor wells with slotted casing from 30 feet bgs to the total depth of the wells Ms <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> The discussion presented in this report is based on the following <br /> 1 The observations and data collected by field personnel <br /> 2 The results of laboratory analyses performed by a state certified analytical laboratory <br /> 3 Our understanding of the regulations of San Joaquin County and the State of California <br /> Changes in groundwater conditions can occur due to variations in rainfall, temperature, local and <br /> regional water use, and local construction practices In addition, variations in the soil and <br /> groundwater conditions could exist beyond the points explored in this investigation <br /> State Certified Laboratory analytical results are included in this report This laboratory follows <br /> EPA and State of California approved procedures, however, WEGE is not responsible for errors in <br /> these laboratory results <br /> 5 SANCHEZ SRPT 5/11/98 <br />