My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006103
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COUNTRY CLUB
>
1876
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542421
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2019 12:38:45 PM
Creation date
6/21/2019 10:30:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006103
RECORD_ID
PR0542421
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0024377
FACILITY_NAME
COUNTRY CLUB BLVD/295950
STREET_NUMBER
1876
STREET_NAME
COUNTRY CLUB
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12319101
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1876 COUNTRY CLUB BLVD
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REVISED PUMP TEST PLAN <br /> The presence of the two groundwater zones A and B and the presence of the monitor wells MW I <br /> through MW5 which are screened across both zones, complicates the performance of a pump test at <br /> this site <br /> Of major concern is the location of MW 1 in relation to RWIA and RW I B and the MW6 cluster <br /> With monitor wells completed across both zones pumping from one zone will cause flow up or <br /> down the cross zone well from the non pumped zone <br /> Upon further modeling of the probable outcome of the interaction of the cross zone wells during <br /> pumping at the site, it is our opinion that the closest cross zone wells MW1, MW2 and MW3 <br /> should be destroyed prior to the pump test and the de-watering of the upper zone <br /> Because the modeling was only preliminary a simple analog model of the interaction of pumping <br /> from RWO 1 A and the cross-zonal flow in MW I was developed The flow up the well is driven by <br /> the difference in head between the two groundwater zones Even in two inch casing, the anticipated <br /> flow between the two zones is significant with even a slight difference in head <br /> From the Hazen-Williams Formula, for anticipated flow in a pipe <br /> Q=0 432CiD263S'14 <br /> Q= ft3/s <br /> Ci= Coefficient dependent on surface roughness approximately 120 <br /> D= pipe diameter in feet <br /> S = head lose in feet per feet of pipe <br /> For a 2-inch pipe with a differential of 0 01 feet per the 3-foot clay Iayer that separates the zones <br /> the flow in the pipe would be 13830 gallons per day <br /> D=2/12=0 167 <br /> S= 0 1/3=0 033 <br /> Q=0 432*120*0 167263*0 0033'14=0 0214 ft3/sec =1 284 cfm = 9 604 gpm or 13830 gpd <br /> From the above it can be assumed that flow between zones in MW 1 would be sufficient to equalize <br /> the head between the two zone even in response to significant pumping at RW01 <br /> The preliminary model used the distance draw down equation to calculate the response to pumping <br /> The equation was solved for three instances <br /> I The response of the upper zone from pumping RW01A <br /> 2 The response of the upper zone to the flow of water from the lower zone to upper zone at <br /> MW 1 <br /> 3 The drawdown of the lower zone in response to flow from the lower zone to the upper zone in <br /> MW 1 <br /> While running the model the flow parameter in MW 1 between the two zones was adjusted so that <br /> the groundwater elevation for both the A and B zone were equal, as the zones responded to <br /> pumping at RW I A <br /> 1 <br /> Rev Pump Test Plan- Appendix A, 1/10/02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.