Laserfiche WebLink
. where it has been breached by drilling. Groundwater is confined to the underlying sand bed because <br /> of the low hydraulic conductivity of the silty clay layer. The clay bed below the sand layer is also an <br /> aquitard, and samples of this bed were also damp but not saturated. <br /> There has been a significant rise in the piezometric surface since the monitoring wells were drilled <br /> in 1994. The depth to groundwater at that time was 19 feet, within a foot of the aqui tard-aquifer <br /> contact. The monitoring wells were therefore screened from 15 to 30 feet. With the rise in the <br /> piezometric surface, the static water level in the wells is now 9 feet above the screened interval. <br /> 5.4 Groundwater Gradient <br /> The data in Table 1 were used to contour the piezometric surface and interpret the groundwater <br /> flow direction, which are illustrated in Figure 6. The piezometric surface now slopes S30°W at a <br /> gradient of 0.0025 ft/ft. This represents a complete reversal in direction from the previous east- <br /> northeast gradient and suggests that groundwater should be flowing toward-smith Canal at present. <br /> The reason for the gradient reversal is probably related to the rise in the piezometric surface into the <br /> upper silty clay layer,but exactly how they are related is uncertain. <br /> 5.5 Laboratory Results <br /> As in the past, a gasoline odor was noticeable in all wells when they were purged. Gasoline and <br /> BTEX compounds were detected in all three wells, but at lower concentrations than in previous <br /> . monitoring events (Table 3). However, concentrations were still sufficiently elevated to prevent <br /> Sequoia from attaining the low detection limits that are desired for the gasoline oxygenates. Bence, <br /> although it is clear that at least four of the oxygenates arc not present at concentrations in excess of <br /> 100 µg/1 (parts per billion), it is possible that one or more may be present above the 35 ppb level <br /> that has been used by many regulatory agencies to require further monitoring and/or remediation of <br /> MTBE. This possibility is suggested by the fact that the concentrations of TBA and MTBE reported <br /> by the previous laboratory (McCampbell Analytical) in November, 1997, are below the detection <br /> limits attained by Sequoia. However, due to the fact that analyses for the oxygenates have been in <br /> use for less than two years and are still not fully proven, the precision of McCampbell's detection <br /> limit is still questionable and it is possible that the results reported previously may be inaccurate. <br /> Figure 7 is a contour map of TPH-gasoline and benzene concentrations inn groundwater samples <br /> collected during the first quarter of 1998. The samples from MW-6 and MW-7 were collected by <br /> Blaine-Tech in February. The samples labeled "west water" and "east water" were collected from <br /> the floor of the open UST excavation by Upgradient in March; and the samples from KF-1, 2, and 3 <br /> were collected by Upgradient in early May. Hence, the contour map does not represent a single <br /> point(day) in time, but it is the best that can be achieved at the present time. <br /> The highest TPH-g concentrations were detected in the excavation samples, which gives the <br /> impression that the USTs were the source of the groundwater contamination. However, the highest <br /> benzene concentration was in KF-3. and the concentrations in the offsite monitoring wells (MW-6 <br /> 7 <br />