Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> CAMBRIA <br /> Even though there were no discharge limitations set for fuel oxygenates, Shell' s goal was to <br /> manage the effluent from the GWE system so that no MTBE was discharged. This goal was <br /> achieved with few exceptions. <br /> On May 20, 2002, MUD staff informed us that they had lost our original discharge permit <br /> application and we needed to reapply for the permit. Based on the conditions of the original <br /> discharge permit, we submitted influent analytical data for TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE with the <br /> new discharge permit application on June 6, 2002. MUD issued a new discharge permit on June <br /> 28, 2002 which had discharge limits similar to the original permit, but MTBE was now regulated <br />! © at <0.5 parts per billion in our effluent. <br /> We continued to operate the GWE system under the new discharge permit conditions until we <br /> received MUD' s October 9, 2003 letter (received on October 14, 2003), which informed us that <br /> the permit conditions had again changed to where no detectable levels of fuel oxygenates would <br /> be allowed in our effluent. We shutdown the GWE system on October 14, 2003 because we did <br /> not have sufficient data to confirm that our effluent did not contain detectable levels of fuel <br /> oxygenates. <br /> Discharge Limit Discussion with the City of Stockton <br /> We discussed these new discharge limits with MUD staff and pointed out that they were <br /> requiring that the site' s effluent levels be cleaner than drinking water standards prior to being <br /> discharged into the sanitary sewer. We also provided MUD with information from other waste <br /> water treatment plants in California that showed that MUD' s discharge limits are more stringent <br /> than any other municipality we have worked with in the state of California. At one point during <br /> these discussions, MUD staff asked us to provide them with information about other <br /> municipalities discharge limits, to propose reasonable discharge limits for MUD staff <br /> consideration, and to also provide information to MUD about the capability of their waste water <br /> treatment plant to treat fuel oxygenates. We presented this information to MUD staff and were <br /> hopeful they would alter the discharge limits for our permit to allow low level discharge of fuel <br /> oxygenates, however the discharge limits were not changed. <br /> NPDES Permit Application <br /> After our attempts to discuss the discharge limits with MUD resulted in no change to our <br /> discharge permit, we then began the process of preparing an NPDES permit application. An <br /> NPDES discharge permit typically allows for low levels of gasoline constituents in the effluent <br /> 0783 2 <br />