Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County <br /> ` " Environmental Health Department DIRECTOR <br /> 2 <br /> Q � 600 East Main Street Donna Heran, REHS <br /> { Stockton , California 95202-3029 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> Robert McClellan, REHS <br /> _ — Jeff Carruesco, REHS, RDI <br /> C9 � � FOR �\P Website: www.sjgov. org/ebd Kasey Foley, REHS ,.f- <br /> Phone : (209) 468-3420 Linda Turkatte, REHS i`XU <br /> Fax: (209) 464-0138 <br /> February 18 , 2011 <br /> Mr. Denis L. Brown Mr. David Hoover <br /> Shell Oil Products US California Fuel Supply Inc <br /> HSEQ / Science & Engineering 587 Ygnacio Valley Road <br /> 20945 S . Wilmington Ave . Walnut Creek, CA 94596 <br /> Carson , CA 90810 <br /> Subject: Former Shell Station, LOP Case #: 390870 <br /> 2575 Country Club Blvd . APN : 123-020-12 <br /> Stockton , CA 95204 Global ID#: T0607732095 <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed <br /> Feasibility Study (Study) by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (CRA) dated October 5, <br /> 2010. The EHD had directed Shell in correspondence dated August 3 , 2010, to submit <br /> the study after it was decided that conducting a pilot test for sodium persulfate was not a <br /> viable remedial alternative to test. <br /> Conclusions in the study stated that since existing dissolved concentrations of sodium , <br /> aluminum , manganese and arsenic exceed water quality objectives (WOOS) , but not <br /> maximum contaminant levels ( MCLS ), the current 'beneficial use' status of the shallow <br /> groundwater at the site should modified to 'non-potable' status so clean up levels for this <br /> site will allow more contamination to remain in place without additional active remediation <br /> being conducted . Based on this premise, Shell concluded that monitored natural <br /> attenuation (MNA) would be an acceptable remedial technology for the site. The EHD <br /> advises that a beneficial status designation for groundwater is not Limited to MCLS or <br /> WQOs and proposals to evaluate residual groundwater contamination at this site must <br /> continue to use beneficial use guidelines. <br /> The EHD has evaluated the concentration trends in monitoring wells MW-5R , MW-8 , MW- <br /> 15 , MW- 18, and extraction well RW-1A for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline <br /> (TPHg ) benzene , and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) since the groundwater extraction <br /> activities have ceased and cannot concur with Shell that a "strong" declining trend is being <br /> exhibited . The "strong" declining trend identified by Shell appears to have been greatly <br /> influenced by data collected during active remediation . Despite the fluctuations in the <br /> groundwater contaminant concentrations overall and the significant increase noted in RW- <br /> 1A, the EHD considers the groundwater concentration plume to be mostly stable and <br /> defined . <br /> In order to continue the evaluation of MNA as an effective and feasible alternative to <br /> active remediation , the EHD directs Shell to address the following concerns in a report <br /> due at the EHD by April 11 , 2011 : <br /> 1 . Provide a Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) and a vapor intrusion <br /> evaluation for the site and the adjacent school buildings . <br />