Laserfiche WebLink
5R Seattle <br /> 5755 a Street East <br /> Tacoma,WA 96424 <br /> STL Tei 253 922 2310 <br /> Fax 253 922 5047 <br /> vwww sl-ince 0 <br /> DATA QUALIFIERS AND ABBREVIATIONS <br /> 131 This analyte was detected in the associated method blank The analyte concentration was determined not <br /> to be significantly higher than the associated method blank (less than ten times the concentration reported <br /> in the blank) <br /> 132 This-analyte=was detected in4he.associated method-blank The_analyte Concentration_in-the-sample_was <br /> determined to be significantly higher than the method blank (greater than ten times the concentration <br /> reported in the blank) <br /> C1 Second column confirmation was performed The relative percent difference value (RPD) between the <br /> resuits on Tne Two columns was evaludied ai iu uc4iai i i ui 1cd to bra <-40%0' <br /> C2 Second column confirmation was performed The RPD between the results on the two columns was <br /> evaluated and determined to be >40% The higher result was reported unless anomalies were noted. <br /> C3 Second analysis confirmation was performed The relative percent difference value (RPD) between the <br /> results on the two columns was evaluated and determined to be < 30% <br /> C4 Second analysis confirmation was performed The RPD between the results on the two columns was <br /> evaluated and determined to be > 30% The original analysis was reported unless anomalies were noted <br /> M. GUMS confirmation was performed The result derived from the original analysis was reported <br /> D The reported result for this analyte was calculated based on a secondary dilution factor <br /> E The concentration of this analyte exceeded the Instrument calibration range and should be considered an <br /> estimated quantity <br /> i The analyte was analyzed for and positively identified, but the associated numerical value is an estimated <br /> quantity <br /> MCL Maximum Contaminant Level <br /> MDL Method Detection Limit <br /> MRL Method Reporting Limit <br /> N See analytical narrative <br /> ND Not Detected <br /> PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit <br /> X1 Contaminant does not appear to be 'typical' product Elution pattern suggests it may be <br /> X2 Contaminant does not appear to be "typical' product <br /> X3 Identification and quantitation of the analyte or surrogate was complicated by matrix interference <br /> X4 RPD for duplicates was outside advisory QC limits The sample was re-analyzed with similar results The <br /> sample matrix may be nonhomogeneous <br /> X4a• RPD for duplicates outside advisory QC limits due to analyte concentration near the method practical <br /> quantitation limit/detection limit. <br /> X5. Matrix spike recovery was not determined due to the required dilution <br /> X6• Recovery and/or RPD values for matrix spike(/matnx spike duplicate) outside advisory QC limits Sample <br /> was re-analyzed with similar results <br /> X7• Recovery and/or RPD values for matrix spike(/matnx spike duplicate) outside advisory QC limits Matrix <br /> Interference may be indicated based on acceptable blank spike recovery and/or RPD <br /> X7a• Recovery and/or RPD values for this spiked analyte outside advisory QC limits due to high concentration <br /> of the analyte in the original sample. S <br /> X8. Surrogate recovery was not determined due to the required dilution <br /> X9 Surrogate recovery outside advisory QC limits due to matrix Interference co <br /> CD <br /> CD <br /> CAM REV 16 1/2003 `° <br />