Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Terryell <br /> July 15, 2003 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Thus, despite Palisades' suggestions, increased concentrations of MtBE and <br /> TBA in groundwater samples collected from VEW3 in 2002 and 2003 indicate <br /> that unauthorized vapor releases occurred at the Site during Palisades' <br /> ownership and operation. These recent releases fully support the SJCEHD's <br /> naming of Palisades as an RP. Accordingly, the SWRCB should deny <br /> Palisades' Petition. <br /> 2. A Tracer Test Performed at the Site Indicates <br /> Bingham McCurchen LLP Unauthorized Releases During Palisades' Tenure <br /> bingham.com <br /> Further supporting SJCEHD's naming of Palisades as an RP is the April 2003 <br /> Tracer test of Palisades' UST system. This test reveals that Palisades' UST <br /> system(fifteen(15) feet from VEW3) has apparent undetected vapor leaks. <br /> See Moise Decl., Ex. 5 for a copy of the Tracer results. In its Petition, <br /> Palisades anticipated that the Tracer test would not indicate a leak. Far from <br /> this, the testing identified multiple potential UST system leaks. Id. The test <br /> results identify possible sources of intermediate level releases of Tracer A and <br /> Tracer W at the Tank 1-2 annular space and the fill at Tank 2,respectively, <br /> and a release of Tracer R and total volatile hydrocarbons near the sump of <br /> Tank 3. Id. In fact, regarding the latter, the test report even suggests that"a <br /> possible liquid release" occurred. Id. The SJCEHD responded to the Tracer <br /> test results in May 2003 by issuing its second URR for the Site within eight(8) <br /> months, again identifying Palisades as the responsible party for the release." <br /> The Tracer test results indicate that Palisades' UST system is the likely source <br /> of new unauthorized releases at the Site and undermine any claim by Palisades <br /> that their UST system is not a source of potential leaks. Coupled with the <br /> MtBE and TBA spiking in 2002 and 2003, the Tracer test results provide <br /> ample credible and reasonable evidence to support SJCEHD's naming of <br /> Palisades as an RP. Accordingly, the SWRCB should affirm the SJCEHD's <br /> action and deny Palisades' Petition. <br /> (Footnote continued from Previous Page.) <br /> 7-11 site (the potential upgradient offsite source) do not suggest an offsite <br /> source for the 2002 and 2003 MtBE and TBA levels in VEW3. See Moise <br /> Decl., Exs. 2 and 3. <br /> " The SJCEHD's May 21, 2003 URR is attached hereto as Exhibit B. <br />