Laserfiche WebLink
Ms Marla Guensler <br /> Exxon Company, U S A <br /> August 25, 1995 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Dissolved oxygen content of the ground water was monitored in the test well, and in each observation <br /> well in the field Analysis of the DO data indicates that DO in the test well (MW-3) increased <br /> significantly during the test from 0 S ppm at the beginning of the test, to between 2 5 and 12 0 ppm <br /> later in the test The DO in the observation wells did show significant increases on some dates <br /> compared with the initial measurements, however, there does not appear to be any general trend in <br /> any of the observation wells with the possible exception of MW-5, which increased steadily through <br /> May 31, 1995, but then dropped back off in June and July 1995 Dissolved oxygen data is <br /> summarized in Table 1 located in Enclosure A <br /> Soil vapor carbon dioxide content above the ground water table was monitored in the test well, and <br /> each observation well by drawing an air sample into a tedlar bag and measuring the carbon dioxide <br /> content using a Drager tube An increase in the carbon dioxide level of the air above the ground <br /> water table indicates that there is increased biodegradation in the ground water, presumably due to <br /> an increase in available DO in the ground water Analysis of the carbon dioxide data indicates that <br /> there was a significant increase in each of the observation wells An increase in biodegradation in <br /> the ground water should aid in the remediation of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons as the microbes <br /> use the petroleum hydrocarbon constituents as a food source. During the test, the most obvious <br /> changes in carbon dioxide were in observation wells MW-1 and MW-6 MW-1 initially contained <br /> 0 5 percent carbon dioxide and increased to 4.0 percent after 8 days of operation This initial <br /> increase stabilized and varied from 2.0 to 5 0 percent over the remainder of the test. MW-6 initially <br /> contained 0 0 percent carbon dioxide and increased to 1 0 percent after 8 days The level then varied <br /> from 0 0 percent to 3 0 percent during the remainder of the test The other two observation wells <br /> (MW-4 and MW-5) also showed increases in carbon dioxide during the test period These increases <br /> in all of the observation wells mdicate that the sparging in MW-3 increased the biodegradation of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon constituents in the ground water at the site during the test period, with a <br /> radius of influence of more than 110 feet. Carbon dioxide data is summarized in Table 2 located in <br /> Enclosure A <br /> Pressure data was collected at each of the observation wells using a magnahelic gauge. An increase <br /> in pressure in the observation wells would indicate that the air being sparged into the ground water <br /> at the test well is increasing the air pressure in the interstitial voids in the soil away from the test <br /> well Analysis of the pressure data collected from the observation wells indicates that the spargmg <br /> of air into the ground water at MW-3 did not affect pressures in the observation wells There was <br /> some pressure influence seen in observation well MW-1 during the first month of the test, however, <br /> this influence dissipated later in the test for unknown reasons Reasons for the absence of pressure <br /> influence in the observation wells may have been due to the distance between the test well and the <br /> observation wells, or the fact that the sparging was not operating continuously due to problems with <br /> the air compressor Pressure data is summarized in Table 3 located in Enclosure A <br /> Ground water samples were collected from the wells on March 31, 1995, as baseline data for the air <br /> spargmg test The ground water samples were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total <br /> xylenes, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline. The concentration of TPH as gasoline <br /> in the ground water in the test well MW-3 on March 31, 1995, was 1,300 micrograms per liter <br /> (,ug/L), and benzene was at 490 µg/L The concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents in <br /> the observation wells (MW-1 and MW-4 through MW-6) were below the laboratory detection limits. <br />