Laserfiche WebLink
SS E C 0 R <br /> 7-Eleven Store #14117 <br /> Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report (2Q2004) <br /> August 13, 2004 <br /> Page 3 <br /> also present in the soil samples indicated possible dry cleaner plume contributions (IT <br /> Corporation, 1999) <br /> On August 14, 2003, deep groundwater monitoring well (MW-8) and one soil boring (SB-1) <br /> were advanced on site SECOR summarized this assessment in the February 27, 2004 <br /> Additional Site Assessment Report and Fate and Transport Model, which also presented <br /> calculations of the lateral migration of dissolved MtBE in groundwater <br /> Per the request of the SJCEHD, groundwater monitoring and sampling is coordinated with a <br /> former Exxon site (currently a USA Gasoline station) immediately east of the 7-Eleven site <br /> MONITORING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES <br /> The depth to water was measured to within 0 01 feet bgs in monitoring wells MW-1 through <br /> MW-6, and MW-8 from top of casing (TOC) using a water level indicator Dissolved oxygen <br /> concentrations were also measured in each well using a YSI Model 550A dissolved oxygen <br /> meter equipped with a down hole sensor MW-7 was not monitored or sampled due to a <br /> vehicle blocking access to the well <br /> Well purging and sampling equipment was thoroughly cleaned prior to purging and <br /> sampling each well The sampling procedure for each well included measuring the water <br /> level and checking for the presence of liquid-phase hydrocarbons (LPH), using either an <br /> electronic indicator and a clear Teflon® bailer or an oil-water interface probe Wells not <br /> containing LPH were purged of approximately three casing volumes of water (or to dryness) <br /> using a submersible pump or bailer The equipment and purging methods used for the <br /> current sampling event are noted on the field data sheets included in Attachment A During <br /> purging, temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity were monitored in order to document <br /> that these parameters were stable prior to collecting samples After purging, water levels <br /> were allowed to recover to 80% of the original levels prior to collection of the water sample <br /> Groundwater samples were collected using a disposable Teflon® bailer, placed into <br /> appropriate Environmental Protection Agency EPA approved containers, labeled, logged <br /> onto chain-of-custody documents, and transported on ice to a California state-certified <br /> laboratory Copies of the field notes are included in Attachment A <br /> GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYSES AND RESULTS <br /> The groundwater samples collected from MW-1 through MW-6, and MW-8 were analyzed <br /> for TPHg, BTEX, and the fuel oxygenates MtBE, tert-butyl alcohol (TBA), diisopropyl ether <br /> (DIPS), ethyl-tert-butyl ether (EtBE), tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME), 1,2-dichloroethane <br /> (1,2-DCA), and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) by EPA Method 8260B The certified laboratory <br /> analytical report and chain-of-custody documentation are presented as Attachment B <br /> Groundwater analytical results are presented on Figure 3, and are summarized in Tables 1 <br /> and 2 Hydrocarbon concentrations were generally consistent with historical data <br /> Dissolved concentrations of MtBE and TBA continue to decline in MW-4 <br /> . PURGE AND RINSATE WATER DISPOSAL <br /> Water generated during well sampling and equipment cleaning was pumped into a SECOR <br /> truck-mounted water tank The water was transferred into properly labeled 55-gallon drums <br /> 14117 04-2Q Report doc SECOR international incorporated <br />