My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544571
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2019 8:30:33 AM
Creation date
6/25/2019 8:13:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544571
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000214
FACILITY_NAME
PILKINGTON NORTH AMERICA INC PLANT 10
STREET_NUMBER
500
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330-9739
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
500 E LOUISE AVE
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VUJ/1-K LUI-b <br /> 1 W dward-Clyde Consultants <br /> in a loss of product during the first test and a gain of product during the <br /> second. The contractor performing the test felt that the tank was sound <br /> and that air bubbles were causing the discrepancies. He also recommended <br /> that the inventory reconciliation system be installed prior to testing the <br /> tank again. Once this investigation and remediation is complete, LOF will <br /> fill in the excavation, complete the installation of the tank monitoring <br /> system, test the tank and -relocate the pump, and pour a concrete slab over <br /> the existing tank and excavation. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the above conclusions and taking into account the current and <br /> potential uses of the local groundwater, we recommend that no additional <br /> remedial actions be taken at the site, other than periodic monitoring of <br /> the two wells. As discussed in the conclusions, the contamination appears <br /> to be localized and migrating very slowly if at all . All wells in the <br /> vicinity of the spill are used for plant and lawn irrigation only with the <br /> closest well located approximately 1100 ft to the northeast (upgradient) -of <br /> the spill . The closest downgradient well is located approximately 1500 ft <br /> away. Furthermore, the adjacent Occidental Chemical Company facility, <br /> located directly downgradient, has been found to have a significant <br /> groundwater contamination problem resulting from the operation of that <br /> facility. Although steps are being taken to remediate the problem, the <br /> groundwater downgradient of the LOF facility will probably be unusable for <br /> the foreseeable future. <br /> We do, however, recommend that LOF implement a monitoring program for the <br /> two wells, MW-17 and MW-18. The program should include monitoring both <br /> wells for the presence of free product on a monthly basis with a water <br /> sample taken for lab analysis from MW-18 once every six months. Should <br /> free product appear in either well or significant levels of dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons be detected in MW-18, the Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> should be notified and additional . remedial actions taken if necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.