My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0003281
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DIAMOND
>
1050
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0001781
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0003281
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 1:07:55 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 10:38:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003281
RECORD_ID
PR0001781
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004090
FACILITY_NAME
DIAMOND WALNUT GROWERS INC
STREET_NUMBER
1050
STREET_NAME
DIAMOND
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
155 320 19 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1050 DIAMOND ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.4 ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS <br /> Laboratory testing demonstrated that both Fe(II) and Cascade° could decrease the <br /> concentration of Cr(VI) in groundwater, both in the presence and absence of site soil <br /> Several points or observations were made that should be considered when evaluating the <br /> feasibility of each reductant for full-scale application <br /> 1 Both reductants decreased the concentration of Cr(VI) in groundwater, but the <br /> effectiveness of each was inhibited by soil This effect was greater for Cascade° <br /> than for Fe(u) <br /> 2 An appropriate dose of Fe(II) solution in the field is probably between about 100 <br /> mg/L and 500 mg/L Fe(II), though PRIMA Environmental strongly recommends <br /> that this suggestion be reviewed by qualified personnel and confirmed by a field <br /> pilot test before beginning full-scale treatment This suggestion is based on the <br /> observations that i) a dose of 100 mg/L Fe(ED decreased the concentration of <br /> Cr(VI) to below the detection lima of 1 µg/L when the soil to liquid ratio was 1 5 <br /> I' (COC Removal test) and u) when the soil to liquid ration was 1 2 (SRD test) and <br /> the initial Fe(II) was 500 mg/L, 3% of the Fe(H) remained after 14 days, <br /> suggesting that Fe(11) can persist for several days in the sub-surface <br /> 3 Laboratory testing provided a first approximation of the amount of Cascade° that <br /> would be needed to reduce the concentration of Cr(VI), but an actual dose should <br /> be determined from a field pilot test Specifically, in the laboratory, a dose of 0 8 <br /> mUL MW-3 groundwater reduced Cr(VI) by 98% in the presence of soil <br /> 4 Treatment with Fe(II) affected more secondary water quality parameters than did <br /> treatment with Cascade° However, it is beyond PRIMA Environmental's Scope <br /> of Work to assess whether the changes were "significant" with respect to this site <br /> It should also be emphasized that the magnitude of the changes may be different <br />' in the field due to differences between field and laboratory conditions Thus, the <br /> results presented in this study should be used as a guide to help determine which <br /> parameters, if any, could potentially be of concern <br /> 5 The amount of acid needed to decrease the pH of site tap water to pH 3 (in order <br /> to prepare Fe(II) solution) is about 300 mL 98% H-)SO4/1000 gallons of water <br /> 6 Site soil can neutralize about 100 mmoles H+/kg soil and about 10 mmol OH-/kg <br /> soil Acid must be neutralized if Fe(II) is used, while base must be neutralized if <br /> Cascade' is used <br /> • <br /> PRIMA Environmentali 15 Eval of Reductants <br /> .January 19, 2005 ATC-Diamond Walnut <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.