Laserfiche WebLink
' Human Health Screening Evaluation <br /> Surland Homes--Bridle Creek February 12,2009 <br /> vicinity of the site. The database report dated July 1, 2008, identified five threatened or <br /> endangered species in the Union Island Quad and Tracy Quad: Swainson's hawk, California tiger <br /> salamander, valley elderberry longhorn beetle, San Joaquin kit fox, and California red-legged <br /> frog. None of these species have been observed within 1 mile of the site; the closest sighting <br /> was a Swainson's hawk approximately 1.5 miles from the site in 1981. Therefore, it does not <br /> appear that threatened, endangered, or sensitive species occur within 1 mile of the site. The <br /> database record from this CNDDB query is included as Appendix C. <br /> 9. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Potential on-site residential cancer risks are IE-06, equivalent to the incremental lifetime cancer <br /> risk point of departure, and an excess cancer risk equal to or below this threshold is considered <br /> acceptable. The total potential non-cancer hazard from oral, dermal, and inhalation exposures to <br /> on-site soils was estimated to be 0.4. This level of hazard is below a hazard index of 1, and <br /> therefore indicates an acceptable non-cancer health hazard for exposures to on-site soils for a <br /> ' hypothetical future resident. As noted, groundwater contact has been eliminated as an exposure <br /> pathway, and was not evaluated in this HHSE. <br /> ' Potential on site construction worker cancer risks are 4E-08, and the non cancer health hazards <br /> are estimated at 0.1. These values both indicate that the site does not pose an unacceptable <br /> health risk to future construction workers. <br /> The results of the HHSE indicate that exposure to chemicals present in soil at the site should not <br /> result in unacceptable health risks for an adult or child on-site resident, or future construction <br /> workers. Therefore, no remedial action is necessary at the site to protect human health, and a <br /> risk management decision of no further action can be made for on-site affected soils. <br /> ' 10. REFERENCES <br /> Bradford et al 1996. Background Concentrations of trace and Major Elements in California <br /> Soil, Kearny Foundation Special Report. University of California,. March. <br /> California Department of Fish and Game, 2008. California Natural Diversity Database. July 7. <br /> Cal/EPA, 1999. Preliminary Endangerment erment Assessment Guidance Manual, Department of Toxic <br /> Substances Control. June. <br /> 1 , 2000. Letter From David L. Berry, Ph.D., Staff Toxicologist,To: Ms. Dink Mather, <br /> Site Mitigation Branch, Region 1, Re: Review of Soil and Groundwater Investigation <br /> ' Report and Human Health Screening Evaluation, Pombo Property, Tracy California. <br /> March. <br /> , 2001. Letter From David L. Berry, Ph.D., Senior Toxicologist, To: Mr. Jerry Lile, <br /> Project Manager, Site Mitigation Branch, Region 1, Re: Review of Updated Human <br /> Health Screening Evaluation, Ridgeway [former Burns] Property, Tracy California. <br /> October. <br /> 14 <br /> From Science to Solutions <br />