My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DURHAM FERRY
>
1600
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544624
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 5:48:15 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 3:27:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0544624
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0005206
FACILITY_NAME
GEORGES SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
1600
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DURHAM FERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25510004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1600 W DURHAM FERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC AEALTH SERVICES I.N. <br /> �o <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2 <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION m <br /> Ernest M. Fujimoto, M. D., M.P.H., Acting Health Officer <br /> 304 E. Weber Ave., Third Floor • P. O. Box 388 • Stockton, CA 95201-0388 c'�JFoa� e <br /> 209/468-3420 <br /> L <br /> MAILED FEB 2 31996 <br /> GEORGE AND MEI TERANISHI <br /> 1600 WEST DURHAM FERRY ROAD <br /> TRACY CA 95376 <br /> RE: GEORGE'S SERVICE SITE CODE: 1550 <br /> 1600 WEST DURHAM FERRY <br /> TRACY CA 95376 <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division has completed review <br /> of the "Work Plan: Additional Site Characterization" dated January 29, 1996 which was <br /> prepared by Geological Technics. PHS/EHD has the following comments for your consideration. <br /> The work plan proposed to continue the soil and groundwater investigation. PHS/EHD concurs <br /> that additional investigation is required so that the extent of soil and groundwater contamination <br /> may be estimated. The work plan indicated that additional monitoring to verify the groundwater <br /> gradient would be performed monthly. Actually, only one measurement is available indicating <br /> that the gradient direction was northerly and that was collected on May 4, 1995. Prior to the <br /> installation of the proposed monitoring wells, it will be necessary that groundwater gradient <br /> information be collected, so that the proposed monitoring wells can be placed in the most <br /> strategic place possible. Initiate the monthly depth to water measurements so that gradient and <br /> direction can be better understood. <br /> Furthermore, PHS/EHD directed you to initiate quarterly groundwater sampling in <br /> correspondence dated November 9, 1995. Groundwater sampling should be initiated <br /> immediately and continue on a quarterly basis until PHS/EHD directs otherwise. Once additional <br /> groundwater monitoring and sampling information is available, permit applications, <br /> encroachment agreements, permit fees ($89 per permit) and a site map should be submitted. It <br /> appears from the recently submitted site map that monitoring wells will be submitted on site, in <br /> San Joaquin County easement, and on private property; thereby requiring three drilling permits. <br /> In addition to the determination of the horizontal extent of soil and groundwater contamination, <br /> PHS/EHD requested that the vertical extent of contamination also be invested, so that the massof <br /> contamination which may require remediation can be estimated. The work plan proposed to <br /> installed a well to at least 25 feet below grade, with a 2.5 feet screened interval and 5.0 feet <br /> sand pack, prior to sealing with bentonite plug and bentonitelcement slurry. Installation of a <br /> deeper well will be decided following evaluation of additional groundwater monitoring data. <br /> The work plan indicated that one soil sample would be collected at the capillary fringe. <br /> Significant soil contamination was detected at the maximum depth of soil borings (10 feet) and <br /> during the installation of the monitoring wells to 20 feet. Soil samples were not collected for <br /> .4 Division of San Joaquin Countv Health Care Services <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.