My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DURHAM FERRY
>
1600
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544624
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 5:48:15 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 3:27:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0544624
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0005206
FACILITY_NAME
GEORGES SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
1600
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DURHAM FERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25510004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1600 W DURHAM FERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GEORGE AND MEI TERANISHI • <br /> 1600 Durham Ferry Rd. <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> The current data suggests that impacted groundwater does not penetrate to the second <br /> sand interval in the former UST area, but may either penetrate deeper or is being drawn <br /> down in the former dispenser area and toward the domestic well north of the site. If the <br /> groundwater in the second and/or third sand 'cleans up', then EHD will consider vertical <br /> assessment of impacted groundwater for this site to be completed. Of concern at this <br /> time is the impacted groundwater encountered in monitor well MW-106 in the second <br /> sand interval, as this groundwater may be migrating toward the domestic well toward the <br /> north. <br /> The FS analyzed several potential remedial alternatives for the site including air <br /> sparging, vapor extraction, monitored natural attenuation, enhanced bioremediation, <br /> pump and treat, dual-phase extraction, soil excavation, and in situ chemical treatment. <br /> After analyzing applicability to the site and cost effectiveness, GTI selected in situ <br /> advanced oxidation as the preferred method of remediation, and propose to install <br /> and/or modify 30 wells to construct the system. <br /> EHD concurs that in situ oxidation may be the most effective remedial method of this <br /> site; however, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) is <br /> currently requiring bench-scale tests of the selected oxidants reacting with soil and <br /> ground water from the zone of anticipated application to evaluate the necessity to issue <br /> a waste discharge requirement (WDR) permit. EHD recommends you contact Mr. James <br /> Barton,•R.G. of the CVRWQCB at (916) 464-4615 to obtain guidance on the test design <br /> and objectives. In general, the testing should detect mobilization of metals, formation of <br /> insoluble precipitates, generation of large biomasses, changes in soil porosity or <br /> permeability, and/or degradation to other toxic compounds. Please provide EHD with a <br /> work plan to acquire soil and impacted ground water samples from the intervals of <br /> intended application and to conduct the bench-scale test by 15 August 2004. Also, <br /> please provide a copy of the work plan to the CVRWQCB. <br /> Questions or comments may be directed to Nuel Henderson at (209)468-3436. <br /> Donna Heran, RENS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> Nuel C. Henderson, Jr., RG Margareagorio, R <br /> Unit IV- Site Mitigation Supervisor, Unit IV <br /> C: James L.L. Barton—CVRWQCB <br /> Ray Kablanow, Eric Price — Geological Technics Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.