Laserfiche WebLink
• � Page 2 of 2 <br /> Jatin <br /> From: Khandwala, Jatin@Waterboards <br /> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 3:07 PM <br /> To: 'rayk@gtienv.com' <br /> Subject: George's Service - 1600 Durham Ferry Road,Tracy(Claim 8475) <br /> Hi Ray, how are you? Hey, I am working with the USTCF in Sacramento. Currently, I am in the process of <br /> reviewing reimbursement request(RR) 34 for the above ref claim. <br /> In order to complete my review, I need some additional information as well as some clarification <br /> regarding some of the items. <br /> 1. Based on my review of the RR pkg, it seems that RR pkg covers work performed from July 2011 <br /> thru March 2012. <br /> 2. Couple of invoices for July and Aug 2011 includes costs associated with advertising and bid pkg <br /> prep. Just wanted to see if you can e-mail me pdf copy of ad. I am assuming that it has to do <br /> with the RAP Implementation. <br /> 3. Can you e-mail me copy of GWM reduction letter? Invoice 8824 includes cost associated with <br /> preparation of this document or letter. <br /> 4. Invoice 8866 includes costs for correspondence(s)with county dated 8/29 and 8/31. Not sure <br /> about the actual format of the correspondence but can we get a copy of that? <br /> 5. Invoice 8866 includes amount charged by American Valley. They indicated that there were no <br /> drums at the site(waste disposal). They charged $55 for travel time. Just curious—why they <br /> were not informed that there were no waste drums at the site? <br /> 6. Based on the information,County had issued a letter regarding GWM frequency in July 2009. <br /> Based on that no GWM has been conducted during Q1 and Q3 for each year. Approx$370 is <br /> charged to prepare generic 2 page letter to indicate that no GWM was conducted.This$370, <br /> includes%:hr time charged by principal engineer to review the generic document for each of <br /> those Qs when no GWM is conducted. This amount is excessive and unreasonable in our <br /> opinion. <br /> 7. Invoice 8930—approx.$160 is charged for preparing correspondence and upload to geotracker. <br /> Is it related to Phase 11 cost analysis correspondence? <br /> 8. Invoice 8950—includes charges for bid prep and advertising? Can we get a copy of <br /> advertisement? <br /> 9. Invoice 2478—approx. $10,600 is charged by Del Tech for RS installation. It also includes <br /> material cost. No supporting documents or sub invoices(material) have been provided. <br /> 10. Apparently GTI and Del Tech worked on RS installation. Wanted to make sure that there is no <br /> overlap of charges related to system installation. Do you have any information regarding tracking <br /> what portion of work was done/performed by which company? <br /> In addition to RR34, I think we have couple more RRs in-house for the same claim (I think). For the <br /> time being I am reviewing RR 34 only. Any information reg above items would be helpful. <br /> Jatin <br /> 11/26/2012 <br />