Laserfiche WebLink
Cleo logia rech4ks/tic. Page 7 <br /> ' IRAP—Pilot Test <br /> Project No. 425.2 <br /> March 21,2005 <br /> 4.2 Site Geology and Hydrogeology <br /> ' The following section discusses the geology and hydrogeology as documented during this <br /> investigation based on the interpretations of the field geologists: <br /> ' • Figure 4,Figure 4 A thru 4 F shows the different cross-sections of the site geology. <br /> ' • The cross sections indicate that the site geology consists of thin layers/lenses of different <br /> soil types. moi.. J,6,; .PSc,c�/�,•cryp ,.e / <br /> • Most of the contamination plume exists in the shallow well zone (screen intervals 5 feet <br /> ' to 22 feet bgs). <br /> • The site geology is heterogeneous for this site. There is different depth versus soil type <br /> ' divisions for every cross-section. However, typically the site geology appears as sand or <br /> silty-sand units that are sandwiched between finer-grained clay units. This may be the <br /> reason that contamination has not moved to the deep zones. <br /> • Depths to groundwater are typically around 12 feet bgs. <br /> ' • Groundwater direction has ranged from northeast to northwest with a greater trend to the <br /> east in the shallow zone (Zone A), and to the northwest in the deeper zone (Zone B) in the <br /> ' last five quarterly monitoring events. <br /> • The average gradient is 0.0013 ft/ft in Zone A and 0.0032 in Zone B. <br /> • Vertical gradient between shallow and deep well pairs has been found predominantly <br /> positive in the quarterly monitoring events. <br /> • Soil samples (in the bench scale sampling) have been analyzed (Appendix C) for <br /> geotechnical data that are summarized in the following table: <br /> Sample Permeability <br /> (cm/s) / <br /> ' BSS-2 @ 18' 3.11 x 10E-5 G/u y <br /> BSS-2 @ 20' 1.07 x 10E-7 57 sakol"wik Ked" <br /> BSS-2 @ 28' 3.95 x 10E-7 S.7 S•-•! <br /> ' BSS-2 @ 30' 4.35 x 1013-6 f <br /> ' 4.3 Contaminant Distribution <br /> The soil and groundwater mass balance calculations were presented in GTI's "Soil <br /> ' Excavation Report" dated January 28, 2002. The calculation spreadsheets used in the <br /> groundwater calculations are included in Appendix B for reference. <br /> ' Approximately 11,632 lbs. of TPH-g was estimated in the calculations, and according to the <br /> excavation contaminant mass removal calculations, approximately 4,900 lbs. (42%) of TPH- <br /> gasoline was removed with soil excavation. Therefore, about 6,700 lbs. of TPH-g has not <br /> ' been removed. <br />