Laserfiche WebLink
Geo(cyca(Techmes 2nc Page 2 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 4212 <br /> March 24, 1998 <br /> 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 1.1 Hydrology of Site <br /> Horizontal Groundwater Gradient <br /> The average groundwater elevation at the site was 76 03 feet above mean sea level The large <br /> change in the average groundwater elevation since the last monitoring event is due to the well <br /> tops being surveyed into an actual USGS benchmark <br /> Table 1 of Appendix A summarizes the groundwater level measurements to date <br /> Groundwater gradient calculations show that the dominant groundwater flow is in a northern <br /> direction with the slope ranging from 0 0012 up to 0 0289 ft/ft <br /> Vertical groundwater gradients were not calculated using MW-2 and MW-102 because the <br /> floating product in MW-2 prevented an accurate depth to water measurement However, past <br /> events has shown the vertical gradient to be 175 to 2 times greater then horizontal See <br /> Table 2 of Appendix A <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Pa-ocedui-e <br /> lei On February 24, 1998, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened the <br /> wells, and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The <br /> water level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot In wells where free floating <br /> product was suspected, a clear disposable bailer is used to gauge the interface <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using either a Grundfos pump or electronic <br /> bailer as recorded in the field logs (Appendix Q The rate of well purging was monitored <br /> The wells were purged of at least three casing volumes and until the groundwater parameters <br /> (temperature, conductivity, and pH) had stabilized (Appendix Q indicating that water, <br /> representative of actual aquifer conditions, was entering the well Groundwater parameter <br /> stabilization was characterized by three successive readings within 10% In this case the <br /> instrument was not calibrating properly, and pH measurements were not considered reliable <br /> Before a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least 80% <br /> of it's initial level All water removed from the monitoring wells and not used as a sample, <br /> was placed in a 55 gallon DOT (Department of Transportation 17-H) approved container that <br /> is properly labeled and temporally stored on-site <br /> I <br /> A bailer was used to collect each sample Bailer cleanliness was assured by collecting a <br /> bailer blank (pouring distilled water through the bailer and collecting it in a VOA vial) prior <br /> to collecting the analytical sample <br />