My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011293
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DURHAM FERRY
>
1600
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544624
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011293
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 7:18:56 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 3:48:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011293
RECORD_ID
PR0544624
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0005206
FACILITY_NAME
GEORGES SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
1600
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DURHAM FERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25510004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1600 W DURHAM FERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geo(cyca(Techmes 2nc Page 2 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 4212 <br /> March 24, 1998 <br /> 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 1.1 Hydrology of Site <br /> Horizontal Groundwater Gradient <br /> The average groundwater elevation at the site was 76 03 feet above mean sea level The large <br /> change in the average groundwater elevation since the last monitoring event is due to the well <br /> tops being surveyed into an actual USGS benchmark <br /> Table 1 of Appendix A summarizes the groundwater level measurements to date <br /> Groundwater gradient calculations show that the dominant groundwater flow is in a northern <br /> direction with the slope ranging from 0 0012 up to 0 0289 ft/ft <br /> Vertical groundwater gradients were not calculated using MW-2 and MW-102 because the <br /> floating product in MW-2 prevented an accurate depth to water measurement However, past <br /> events has shown the vertical gradient to be 175 to 2 times greater then horizontal See <br /> Table 2 of Appendix A <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Pa-ocedui-e <br /> lei On February 24, 1998, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened the <br /> wells, and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The <br /> water level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot In wells where free floating <br /> product was suspected, a clear disposable bailer is used to gauge the interface <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using either a Grundfos pump or electronic <br /> bailer as recorded in the field logs (Appendix Q The rate of well purging was monitored <br /> The wells were purged of at least three casing volumes and until the groundwater parameters <br /> (temperature, conductivity, and pH) had stabilized (Appendix Q indicating that water, <br /> representative of actual aquifer conditions, was entering the well Groundwater parameter <br /> stabilization was characterized by three successive readings within 10% In this case the <br /> instrument was not calibrating properly, and pH measurements were not considered reliable <br /> Before a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least 80% <br /> of it's initial level All water removed from the monitoring wells and not used as a sample, <br /> was placed in a 55 gallon DOT (Department of Transportation 17-H) approved container that <br /> is properly labeled and temporally stored on-site <br /> I <br /> A bailer was used to collect each sample Bailer cleanliness was assured by collecting a <br /> bailer blank (pouring distilled water through the bailer and collecting it in a VOA vial) prior <br /> to collecting the analytical sample <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.