Laserfiche WebLink
GeoCoguaf?ec�inus Srrc Page 2 <br /> Soil Groundwater Investigation Report <br /> George s Service <br /> Project No 425 2 <br /> August 5 1997 <br /> boring to 50 feet below grade The borings were subsequently converted into 2 inch diameter <br /> monitor wells <br /> 2.1 Soil Boring Installation <br /> In an effort to define the lateral extent of petroleum hydrocarbons, five (5) soil borings, MW- <br /> 4 through MW-8 were advanced They were drilled to 22' below grade and converted into <br /> monitoring wells The soil borings were drilled using a 8 inch outside diameter (o d ), <br /> continuous flight, hollow stem auger owned and operated by V&W Drilling (C57# 720904) <br /> Based on hydrologic data from the three existing monitoring wells on site, well placement <br /> was based on a northerly groundwater flow direction <br /> To define the vertical extent of petroleum hydrocarbons, one (1) soil boring, MW-102, was <br /> advanced to 50 feet and then converted to a monitoring well screened from 45 to 47 5 feet <br /> below ground surface The boring was drilled in three stages as described below <br /> 1 The first stage was drilled with an 8" hollow stem auger down to 39 feet Soil samples <br /> were collected at five foot intervals <br /> 2 In stage two the 8 inch augers were then pulled from the hole and the borehole was <br />' drilled out with a 12 inch hollow stem auger to 39 feet This auger then was temporally <br /> left in the ground to function as a conductor casing during the installation of the deep <br /> well <br /> 3 In stage three the 8 inch augers, which had been decontaminated, were lowered down the <br /> inside of the 12 inch augers The borehole was there advanced to 50 feet Samples were <br /> collected at five foot intervals <br /> This method of drilling reduced the possibility of dragging contamination from the shallow <br /> contaminated zone into the deeper soil and groundwater <br /> A monitoring well permit was secured from San Joaquin County and the agency was notified <br /> 48 hours prior to commencing work The subsurface was cleared of underground utilities by <br /> notifying Underground Service Alert and by consulting with the property owner <br /> Soil cuttings and drilling decontamination water were placed in DOT-17 55 gallon drums and <br /> placed alongside the building until there disposal could be arranged <br /> 2.1.1 Soil Sampling Procedure <br /> Soil samples were collected for geological and analytical evaluation at five foot intervals A <br /> boring log providing sediment description using the U S C S and field observations was <br /> maintained by a professional geologist working under the supervision of a registered <br /> geologist Soil samples were collected in 6 0 inch brass liners using a 2 0 inch modified <br /> California split spoon sampler All soil samples were sealed with Teflon sheets, capped with <br /> plastic end caps, labeled, and placed in a cooler at 4° Celsius for transport to the laboratory <br /> following Chain of Custody protocol <br /> Because every soil sample collected was not submitted for laboratory analysis, a screening <br /> process was to gather additional information through field observation noting sediment type, <br /> especially grain size and clay content, moisture content, visible evidence of contamination, <br /> i e , color change due to reduction of iron or discoloration from hydrocarbons and other <br /> pollutants, and the readings above background on a organic vapor meter (OVM) The OVM <br /> is a field portable photo ionization detector that uses a 10 0 eV lamp to detect compounds <br /> with ionization potential below 10 0 eV (hydrocarbon range) <br />