Laserfiche WebLink
gleofag.dT?chmrs Inc Page 4 <br /> Soil Groundwater Investigation Report <br /> George s Service <br /> Project No 425 2 <br /> August 5, 1997 <br /> two boreholes, samples collected from MW-8A were used for both analytical and geological <br /> evaluation, rather then collect additional samples from the new boring The well was <br /> finstalled as described above <br /> Deeper Well <br /> The deeper monitoring well was constructed using 2 0 inch diameter PVC casing with flush <br /> threads The screened intervals extended from 45 to 47 5 feet below ground surface, or about <br /> 37 to 39 5 feet below the water table. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 7 to 8 <br /> feet below grade A 93 sand filter pack surrounded and extended two feet above the 0 020 <br /> inch screened interval and was topped by a two and a half foot weighted bentomte pellet <br /> transition seal installed on top of the filter pack A surface seal was achieved by pumping a <br /> neat cement grout (augmented with <4% bentonite) via a tremie tube The well was secured <br /> with a locking watertight cap encased in flush mounted traffic rated well box <br /> On July 26, 1997, Don Light of Del Tech mobilized to the site to developed the new <br /> monitoring wells (using mechanical surging and pumping methods) until a clear stream of <br /> water was obtained On May 5, 1997, Don Light returned to the site to purge and collect <br /> groundwater samples from the three existing monitoring wells on site, the 6 new monitoring <br /> wells and three domestic wells associated with the site All development and purge water <br /> was containerized in 55 gallon DOT approved containers and stored on site until its <br /> disposition could be arranged <br /> 2.2.1 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> The groundwater in the new well was sampled no sooner than 24 hours after well <br /> development The following was the procedure for the sampling of groundwater from the <br /> 10 well <br /> Before sampling was attempted the well was sounded for depth to water The wells were <br /> then purged of at least 3 well volumes of stagnant water using a submersible pump Purging <br /> continued until the temperature, conductivity, and pH of the groundwater has stabilized <br /> (<10% variation between three readings) indicating that formation water representative of <br /> aquifer conditions was entering the well These water quality parameters were measured at <br /> intervals of each well volume purged <br /> A stainless steel bailer was used to collect each sample Care was taken to minimize sample <br /> agitation from the initial filling of the bailer to the transfer of the sample to the VOA vial and <br /> glass amber liter bottles Once the sample container was filled and capped, the bottle was <br /> then inverted, tapped, and checked for head space bubbles The sample container was then <br /> identified and labeled with a unique designation, inserted into foam holders and placed in an <br /> ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br /> All non disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated using a steam cleaner before <br /> and between uses The effectiveness of the decontamination procedure is ensured by using <br /> the following quality control measures <br />' o Disposable gloves were used by the technician to collect all samples and were changed <br /> with each sampling event <br />' o A bailer blank for the well was collected prior to sampling by filling the decontaminated <br /> stainless steel bailer with water (provided by the laboratory) and then filling a VOA vial <br /> (provided by the laboratory) using the same procedures for actual sample collection <br />