Laserfiche WebLink
Geological Technics& Page 2 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 425 2 <br /> November 12,2001 <br /> ' • The predominant groundwater gradient direction for the intermediate depth aquifer <br /> ' is towards the east-northeast For the September 7, 2001 event the direction was <br /> calculated to be southeast and this is the second time this beanng has been <br /> recognized <br /> ' . Vertical groundwater gradients do exist at the site and range from 2 to 20 times the <br /> magnitude of the horizontal gradient At times the site has experienced both a <br /> negative and positive vertical gradient No clear trend has been recognized to <br /> account for these differences, but variations in community groundwater pumping <br /> and rainfall may be causal factors Thus, during low pumping demand, the vertical <br /> groundwater gradient would be expected to be upward, and the inverse would also <br /> be expected <br /> 2 Groundwater Contamination <br /> • Contaminant concentrations have decreased in all five wells that contained BTEX <br /> fand TPH-G during the .Tune, 2001 event The impacted soils in the vicinity of the <br /> former USTs were excavated in July 2001 The decrease may be reflective of the <br /> reduction of available mass to leach to groundwater Additional monitoring is <br /> required to determine contaminant trends <br /> o All of the deep-screened wells (MW-102, MW-105 MW-107 and MW-202) were <br /> non-detect for the event This is the fourth consecutive event for this condition <br /> o The domestic wells associated with the site were non-detect for all constituents <br /> ' 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> ' 1.1 Hydrology of Site <br /> t1..1.1 Horizontal Groundwater Gradients <br /> Water Table Wells <br /> The average water table elevation at the site on September 7, 2001 was 72 24 feet above <br /> mean sea level This represents a decrease of 0 25 feet since the June 2001 monitoring <br /> event The water table groundwater gradient was 0 0017 ft/ft flowing N08°W A review of <br /> ' the groundwater gradients shows that the dominant groundwater flow during 2000 & 2001 <br /> was to the north-northeast with the slope ranging from 0 0015 up to 0 0044 ft/ft Table 1 of <br /> Appendix A summarizes the water table groundwater gradients and levels to date, and <br /> ' Figure 2A illustrates the September 7, 2001 groundwater direction and gradient <br /> Intermediate & Deep Wells <br /> The average groundwater elevation in the intermediate depth wells (MW-102, MW-105 & <br /> MW-107) for September was 71 97 feet above mean sea level and the intermediate depth <br /> groundwater gradient was 0 016 ft/ft flowing S48°E <br />