My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011338
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DURHAM FERRY
>
1600
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544624
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011338
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 7:27:18 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 3:52:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011338
RECORD_ID
PR0544624
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0005206
FACILITY_NAME
GEORGES SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
1600
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DURHAM FERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25510004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1600 W DURHAM FERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CjeologrealTechnics Inc Page 3 <br /> Groundwater Monrtonng Report <br /> Project No 425 2 <br /> February 1,2001 <br /> upward direction with a magnitude of about ten times that of the horizontal gradient The <br /> vertical gradient in the intermediate/deep well pair was upward at a magnitude of <br />' approximately ten times that of the horizontal gradient <br /> This site has experienced both negative (downward) vertical gradients and positive <br /> 1 (upward) vertical gradients Typically the negative vertical gradients are 1 75 to 2 times <br /> greater than gradients in a horizontal direction and the positive vertical gradients are an <br /> order of magnitude greater than horizontal <br /> Refer to Table 3 of Appendix A for a summary of the vertical gradient calculations <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Samphng Procedure <br /> On December 27, 2000 Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened <br /> the wells, and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The <br /> water level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot In wells where free-floating <br /> product was suspected, a clear disposable bailer was used to gauge the interface Free <br /> product was not evident in any well for the event <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Centrifugal pump as recorded in the <br /> field logs (Appendix C) The rate of well purging was monitored The wells were purged <br /> of at least three casing volumes or until the groundwater parameters (temperature, <br /> ' conductivity, and pH) had stabilized (Appendix C) indicating that water, representative of <br /> actual aquifer conditions, were entering the well Groundwater parameter stabilization was <br /> characterized by three successive readings within 10% <br /> Before a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least <br /> 80% of its initial level All water removed from the monitoring wells and not used as a <br /> sample, was placed in a 55 gallon DOT (Department of Transportation 17-H) approved <br /> container that is properly labeled and temporanly stored on-site <br /> A stainless steel bailer was used to collect each sample Extreme care was exercised while <br /> collecting samples to prevent agitation of the water contained in the bailer Water samples <br /> were transferred from the bailer into 40-m1 VOA vials preserved with hydrochloric acid <br /> using a bottom-emptying device that minimizes sample aeration during transfer of the <br /> sample All samples were checked for headspace bubbles, labeled, inserted into foam <br /> jholders and placed in an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br /> The sampling technician wore disposable gloves while collecting all samples <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.