Laserfiche WebLink
Geo(ogtcaf?echnws 2nc Page 3 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 425 2 <br /> January 12,2001 <br /> 1.1.2 Vertical Groundwater Gradients <br /> Vertical groundwater gradients were calculated using MW-2 / 102 (shallow/intermediate <br /> well pair) and MW-102 / 202 (intermediate/deep well pair) During the September 2000 <br /> event the vertical groundwater gradient in the shallow/intermediate well pair was in a <br />' downward direction with a magnitude of five times that of the horizontal gradient The <br /> vertical gradient in the intermediate/deep well pair was upward at a magnitude <br />' approximately 1 5 times that of the horizontal gradient <br /> This site has experienced both negative (downward) vertical gradients and positive <br /> (upward) vertical gradients Typically the negative vertical gradients are 1 75 to 2 times <br /> greater than gradients in a horizontal direction and the positive vertical gradients are an <br /> order of magnitude greater than horizontal <br />' Refer to Table 3 of Appendix A for a summary of the vertical gradient calculations <br />' 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On September 20, 2000 Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened <br /> the wells, and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The <br /> water level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot In wells where free-floating <br /> product was suspected, a clear disposable bailer was used to gauge the interface Free <br /> product was not evident in any well for the event <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Centrifugal pump as recorded in the <br />' field logs (Appendix C) The rate of well purging was monitored The wells were purged <br /> of at least three casing volumes or until the groundwater parameters (temperature, <br />' conductivity, and pH) had stabilized (Appendix C) indicating that water, representative of <br /> actual aquifer conditions, were entering the well Groundwater parameter stabilization was <br /> characterized by three successive readings within 10% <br /> iBefore a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least <br /> 80% of its initial level All water removed from the monitoring wells and not used as a <br />' sample, was placed in a 55 gallon DOT (Department of Transportation 17-H) approved <br /> container that is properly labeled and temporarily stored on-site <br />' A stainless steel bailer was used to collect each sample Bailer cleanliness was assured by <br /> collecting a bailer blank (pouring distilled water- through the bailer and collecting it in a <br /> VOA via]) prior to collecting the analytical sample <br /> Extreme care was exercised while collecting samples to prevent agitation of the water <br /> contained in the bailer Water samples were transferred from the bailer into 40-m1 VOA <br />