Laserfiche WebLink
Cieologkal Technia t ac Page 5 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 425 2 <br /> July 26, 2002 - <br /> • All three of the domestic wells were non-detect for the event <br />' • Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) was measured (Table 5) The results suggest that <br /> well MW-2 is in the core of the contamination plume or is immediately down gradient <br /> of the plume Negative ORP values indicate that the wells are within the halo of <br /> reaction depleted water caused by biodegradation of the contaminants For the June <br /> 2002, event, five water table wells had negative ORP values <br /> 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> The following conclusions have been drawn regarding the status of the groundwater at this <br /> site and recommendations for future work <br />' Conclusions <br /> 1 The water table groundwater gradient historically flowed in a northerly direction at <br /> I about 0 002 ft/ft prior to May 1998 However, since that time, the gradient has <br /> fluctuated from north to northeast <br /> 2 The intermediate depth groundwater has flowed easterly, with two shifts to southeast <br /> during September 2000 & September 2001 The northerly flow direction during <br /> December 3 event was anomalous, as the December 21 event was again consistent with <br /> the historical data showing an easterly flow <br /> 3 Vertical groundwater gradients have been found to be flowing upward during winter and <br /> early spring and downward during late spring and summer This may be due to the <br /> annual cycle of the groundwater pumping needs of the community <br />' 4 The dominance of upward vertical flow of groundwater may be the primary reason the <br /> contaminants has not impacted the drinking water aquifer <br /> 5 The shallow water table groundwater plume is laterally defined except to the west <br /> tHowever, the data indicate that the contamination does attenuate toward the west <br /> 6 Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the groundwater at the site fluctuate with each <br /> ' monitoring event The residual contamination in soil up-gradient of MW-2 remains a <br /> significant source of impact to the groundwater plume <br /> 7 The deeper groundwater plume is defined vertically since MW-102 and MW-202 <br /> remain non-detect for contaminants <br /> 8 The three domestic wells sampled for the event remain non-detect <br />' Reconimcndations <br /> The following recommendations are made <br /> 1 The current quarterly monitoring schedule should be maintained to determine <br />' contaminant trends <br /> 2 San Joaquin County PHS/EHD issued a letter on July 10, 2002 denying GTI's work <br /> plans for bio-venting In the letter they directed that additional characterization needs to <br />