Laserfiche WebLink
Geolagkal Techaks Inc Page 11 <br /> ' Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> • Project No 425 2 <br /> November 8,2005 <br /> ' E <br /> 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> ' Conclusions <br /> 1 BTEX and TPH-G constituents have peaked in MW-1 and MW-2 and are showing <br /> ' decreasing concentrations This is likely due to the plume moving off-site to the north <br /> and northeast <br /> 2 BTEX and TPH-G constituents have reached MW-8 and are likely to reach MW-7 and <br /> MW-6 by early 2006 <br /> 3 The dominance of upward vertical flow of groundwater may be the primary reason <br /> contamination is not impacting Zone C and D or the drinking water aquifer <br /> 4 Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the groundwater at the site fluctuate with each <br /> monitoring event The residual contamination in soil, up gradient of MW-2, remains a <br /> significant source of impact to the groundwater plume <br /> 5 Generally the soil and groundwater testing data suggests that the contaminants have <br /> spread laterally, but not vertically to any great extent into the deeper aquifer horizons <br /> ' This may be due primarily to the upward flow of groundwater observed at this site It is <br /> also observed that the groundwater plume does not appear to be continuing to spread <br /> laterally down gradient The leading edge seems to be stationary, suggesting that if the <br /> high concentrations of contaminants could be further reduced and if oxygen could be <br /> introduced into the subsurface, the contaminant plume should collapse <br /> 6 The three domestic wells sampled remain non-detect above laboratory reporting limits for <br /> ' all analyzed constituents, indicating that the drinking water aquifer has not been <br /> impacted <br /> ' Recommendations <br /> The following recommendations are made <br /> ' 1 Continue quarterly groundwater monitoring events <br /> 2 Implement scope of work discussed in GTIs Feasibility and In-Situ Remediation Pilot <br /> Test Work Plan dated June 14, 2005 and approved by SJCEHD in a letter dated <br /> September 16, 2005 (in Progress) <br /> i <br />