Laserfiche WebLink
CW(og&jITedut&slar. Page 3 <br /> +y Additional Site Characterization <br /> And 15'Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Project No.425.2 <br /> March 22,2004 <br /> Well o. ia. creen of Frans. ea rout ea <br /> _ - - - -sur ace <br /> _ - - - -sur ace <br /> 3T-2Y'___72_ -sur ace <br /> - . -su ace <br /> Groundwater was first encountered at approximately 14 feet bgs. A #3 sand filter pack <br /> �- surrounded and extended not less than one foot above the 0.020 inch screened interval and <br /> was topped by a two-foot bentonite chip transition seal installed on top of the filter pack. A <br /> surface seal was achieved by pumping a neat cement grout (augmented with <4% <br /> L. bentonite). The wells were surged using a clean surge block to achieve maximum filter <br /> pack density prior to installing the bentonite transition seal. The well was secured with a <br /> locking watertight cap encased in a flush mounted traffic rated well box. The boring logs <br /> (Appendix C) contain the details of construction. <br /> Soil cuttings and drilling decontamination water were placed in DOT-17 55-gallon drums <br /> and stored on site until their disposal can be arranged. <br /> 2.1.1. Soil Sampling Procedure <br /> Between September and October 2003, GTI collected soil samples and maintained a log <br /> from two of the soil borings (MW-201 and MW-106). The samples were gathered in 6.0- <br /> inch brass liners using a 2.0-inch modified California split spoon sampler. The middle 6.0- <br /> inch brass liner was selected for laboratory analyses. The ends were covered with Teflon <br /> sheets and sealed with plastic caps. The brass liners and plastic caps were washed with an <br /> +..• Alconox solution and double rinsed prior to use. <br /> The sampling technician wore disposable gloves while collecting all samples. <br /> �. Up to five soil samples from each boring were submitted for laboratory analysis and a <br /> screening process was used to gather information through field observations. The field <br /> screening included: <br /> • Sediment type, especially grain size and clay content <br /> • Moisture content <br /> �. 0 Visible evidence of contamination (i.e., color change due to reduction of iron or <br /> discoloration from hydrocarbons and other pollutants) <br /> • Odor (measured via OVM, a portable photo ionization detector that uses a 10.6 eV lamp <br /> to detect compounds with ionization potential below 10.6 eV). <br /> Details on the geology encountered during the well installation, as well as the field <br /> observations, are included in Section 3.2, Geology and Field Observations. <br /> See Appendix C, Boring Logs for more information. <br /> �- 2.1.2 Soil Laboratory Analyses <br /> The following summarizes the soil sample testing used for this phase of work. The soil <br /> samples collected on September 23 and October 21, 2003, were delivered to Sherwood Labs <br /> (California ELAP No. 1400), of Hilmar, California, for the following analyses: <br />