My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DURHAM FERRY
>
4491
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544625
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 8:12:28 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 4:20:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0544625
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003113
FACILITY_NAME
ZAPIEN MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
4491
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DURHAM FERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25504003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4491 W DURHAM FERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
410
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLEARWATEX <br /> G R O U P, 1 N C, <br /> Erni ranmev¢trs!Sernfres - <br /> 2.1.3 Recovery Well Installation and Develo meat <br /> The recovery well was constructed with clean, flush threaded, schedule 40 polyvinyl <br /> chloride (PVC), 4-inch 'diameter' well 'Materials. Well' screen, with 0.020-inch <br /> slotting, was extended from 10 to 30 feet below grade. Blank PVC was coupled to the <br /> screen .and extended to the surface. The filter pack .consists of clean #3 Lonestar <br /> Sand installed fro&9 to 30 feet below grade, and was sealed with a 3-foot thick layer <br /> of hydrated bentonite. The remaining. annular space was filled with neat cement. <br /> The well was capped with a locking expansion plug, and a tamper resistant well-box <br /> was .set with concrete over the wellhead. Well construction detail is included in <br /> Appendix A. <br /> Recovery well RW-1 was developed on May 19, 1995 by a combination of surging <br /> and bailing. Following surging, water was removed from the well using a clean <br /> bailer until the water was relatively free of sediment, and pH, temperature,. and <br /> r conductivity of the water had stabilized. <br /> 2.1.4 Sparge Well Installation <br /> The sparge wells were constructed with clean, flush threaded, schedule. 40 (PVC), 2- <br /> inch diameter well materials. .Well screen, with 0.020-inch slotting, was extended <br /> from approximately 23 to 25 feet below grade. Blank-PVC was:coupled to.the screen <br /> and extended to the surface. The filter pack consists of clean #3 Lonestar Sand <br /> installed from 22 to 25 feet below grade, and was sealed with a 3-foot thick layer of <br /> hydrated bentonite. The remaining annular space was filled with neat cement. The <br /> well was capped'with a locking expansion plug, and a tamper resistant well-box was <br /> set with concrete over the wellhead. Well construction details are included in <br /> Appendix A. <br /> 2.2 Groundwater Sampling (4th Quarter 1995 and 1st Quarter 1996) <br /> 2.21 ..Groundwater Gau in -,and Sampling Methods <br /> On October.19, 1995, and January 5, 1996, Clearwater,gauged the depth to water in all <br /> monitoring and recovery wells. A water sample was also collected from the <br /> domestic well on January 5, 1996. The thickness of SPH in well MW-1 was also <br /> measured. Well MW-1 was not sampled due to presence of SPH. The remaining <br /> I� <br /> wells were purged of approximately three saturated casing volumes .prior to <br /> sampling. During purging, groundwater was monitored for stabilization of <br /> temperature, conductivity;-and pH. All wells were then sampled once water levels <br /> had recovered to approximately 80% of the pre-purge water level. Well gauging and <br /> purging field data is presented as Appendix C. <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells usingde`dicated_-)� <br /> polyethylene bailers. The samples were given the same designationnation as the well <br /> from which they were collected. Samples were labeled, documented on a chain-of- <br /> D-107,PAR/RAP 4 June 11, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.