Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Because EVR induces and/or increases air movement in the unsaturated zone, it is conceived <br /> that EVR may be beneficial to SVE remediation and in-situ bioremediation. With SVE, as <br /> described by Brown (1994), Christenson et. al. (1989), and Struttman and Holderman (1992), <br /> the vacuum used to recover soil vapors could result completely, or partially, from the <br /> application of EVR. With bioslurping and/or bioventing, as described by Brown (1994), <br /> Capuano and Johnson (1996), Downey and Hall (1992), and Yancheski and McFarland <br /> (1992), EVR methodologies can be applied to optimize bio-slurping system operations and <br /> subsurface air movement induced by the EVR vacuum could be used to supply additional <br /> oxygen to beneficial microbes. <br /> 2.0 Procedures <br /> This section presents the methods and equipment used in the EVR pilot test. <br /> 2.1 Test Preparation <br /> Test preparation included test design, recovery and observation well construction, well head <br /> fabrication, and vacuum and treatment equipment selection. <br /> 21.1 Test Design <br /> The test was devised to examine the potential for increasing groundwater production from the <br /> low yield aquifer at the test site and the viability of a groundwater recovery system that <br /> would riot require downhole pumps, timers, or downhole level switches. With respect to <br /> increased water production, the goal of the pilot test was to maintain a discharge rate of 1 <br /> gpm or better, which represents a two-fold increase over the measured values from non-EVR <br /> pumping and conventional vacuum recovery. With respect to downhole pumps, switches, or <br /> timers, the goal was to reduce operation and maintenance (O&M) requirements in the <br /> permanent remediation system. Presently, most pump and treat remediation systems in low <br /> yield aquifers require the use of numerous wells which are often controlled with groundwater <br /> level sensing switches or timers. The planned duration of.the test was 72 hours and <br /> evaluation of the resultant data indicated that this was an appropriate test duration to examine <br /> efficacy and gather information necessaryfor future design. <br /> SVE remediation of the contaminated vadose soils at the proximal end of the dissolved-phase <br /> groundwater plume was underway at the time the EVR pilot study was conducted. The <br /> contaminated vadose zone soils are comprised of well graded gravel amenable to this type of <br /> treatment. The EVR pilot test was conducted at the distal end of the groundwater plume. <br /> The test was conducted and test wells were place with the understanding that a successful the <br /> EVR final design would incorporate groundwater recovery from 2 or 3 points, rather than the <br /> 6 or more that would be required with conventional pumping. <br /> 2.2.2 Test Well Construction <br /> It wasdetermined that one recovery well and four observation wells were necessary to <br /> conduct the pilot test. Three of the observation wells were placed up gradient of the recovery <br /> wells at distances of 5, 12, and 20 feet. An existing monitoring well located 40 feet cross <br /> gradient from the recovery well, was used as a fourth observation well. <br /> 517 <br />