Laserfiche WebLink
CLEAOR-� ATW"! ER <br /> G R O lJ P, INC <br /> 5 2 3 Soil Vapor Extraction Testing <br /> 4n December 21, 1995, Clearwater conducted soil vapor extraction tests on vapor <br /> wells VW-1, VW-2, and VW-3 These tests were completed by attaching a vacuum <br /> blower (regenerative type Rotron model E7O7) to the wellhead and increasing the <br /> vacuum and air flow in steps Air flow from each test well was regulated using a <br /> dilution valve at the inlet of the blower Each step lasted approximately 30 to 45 <br /> minutes and total testing time on an individual well averaged approximately 2 5 <br /> hours <br /> During tests, vacuums, air flowrates, hydrocarbon concentrations, and percent lower <br /> explosive limit and oxygen were monitored at the test well During tests on vapor <br /> wells VW-2 and VW-3, induced vacuums at all monitoring wells (except MW-3) <br /> and vapor wells were monitored for radius of influence data Induced vacuums at <br /> observation wells were not measured during the test on vapor well VW-1 An air <br /> sample was collected from each vapor well at the end of each test for TPHg and <br /> BTEX analysis to evaluate the potential hydrocarbon removal rates of contaminants <br /> trapped in the vadose zone <br /> 5 2 4 Air Testing <br /> Following the dual-phase test, an air sparge test was conducted on SW-1 Prior to <br /> initiating the test, static water levels and dissolved oxygen content in observation <br /> wells were measured The sparge test was conducted using a compressor to <br /> pressurize well SW-1 until air flow was induced through the well screen (screened <br /> from 23 to 25 feet below grade) Soil vapor was extracted concurrently from vapor <br /> well VW-3 in a manner similar to that described above During the air spargxng test, <br /> pressure and air flow into the sparge well were monitored, and vacuums/pressures <br /> at observation wells were monitored The test was completed in steps using <br /> different pressures and flowrates At the end of the test, water levels and dissolved <br /> oxygen content were measured for comparison to static levels prior to the test An <br /> air sample was collected from vapor well VW-3 at the end of the test for comparison <br /> with the air sample analytical results from the simple vapor extraction test <br /> accomplished earlier All air samples were analyzed for concentrations of TPHg and <br /> BTEX by Trace Analysis Laboratory, Inc <br /> 5.3 Feasibility Test Results <br /> 5 3 1 Aduifer Test Results <br /> The constant discharge test was run for approximately 14 25 hours on RW-1 at a <br /> flow rate of 5 gpm By the end of the test, drawdown in RW-1 had stabilized at <br /> approximately 6 2 feet from static Drawdown was observed in all wells monitored <br /> during the test, including MW-3, located approximately 100 feet downgradient of the <br /> pumping well Drawdown observed in neighboring monitoring wells ranged from <br /> I <br /> D-107,PAR/RAP 9 February 21, 1996 <br />