Laserfiche WebLink
C.EARWATER <br /> C R O U P, I ISI C <br /> 2 13 Recovery Well Installation and Development <br /> The recovery well was constructed with clean, flush threaded, schedule 40 polyvinyl <br /> chloride (PVC), 4-inch diameter well materials Well screen, with 0 020-inch <br /> slotting, was extended from 10 to 30 feet below grade Blank PVC was coupled to the <br /> screen and extended to the surface The filter pack consists of clean #3 Lonestar <br /> Sand installed from 9 to 30 feet below grade, and was sealed with a 3-foot thick layer <br /> of hydrated bentonite The remaining annular space was filled with neat cement <br /> The well was capped with a locking expansion plug, and a tamper resistant well-box <br /> was set with concrete over the wellhead Well construction detail is included in <br /> Appendix A <br /> Recovery well RW-1 was developed on May 19, 1995 by a combination of surging <br /> and bailing Following surging, water was removed from the well using a clean <br /> bailer until the water was relatively free of sediment, and pH, temperature, and <br />' conductivity of the water had stabilized <br /> 2 14 Sparge Well Installation <br /> The sparge wells were constructed with clean, flush threaded, schedule 40 (PVC), 2- <br /> inch diameter well materials Well screen, with 0 020-inch slotting, was extended <br /> from approximately 23 to 25 feet below grade Blank PVC was coupled to the screen <br /> and extended to the surface The filter pack consists of clean #3 Lonestar Sand <br /> installed from 22 to 25 feet below grade, and was sealed with a 3-foot thick layer of <br /> hydrated bentonite The remaining annular space was filled with neat cement The <br /> well was capped with a locking expansion plug, and a tamper resistant well-box was <br /> set with concrete over the wellhead Well construction details are included in <br /> IAppendix A <br /> 2.2 Groundwater Sampling (4th Quarter 1995 and 1st Quarter 1996) <br /> 2 2 1 Groundwater Gauging and Sampling Methods <br /> On October 19, 1995, and January 5, 1996, Clearwater gauged the depth to water in all <br /> monitoring and recovery wells A water sample was also collected from the <br /> domestic well on January 5, 1996. The thickness of SPH in well MW-1 was also <br /> measured Well MW-1 was not sampled due to presence of SPH The remaining <br /> wells were purged of approximately three saturated casing volumes prior to <br /> sampling During purging, groundwater was monitored for stabilization of <br /> temperature, conductivity, and pH All wells were then sampled once water levels <br /> had recovered to approximately 80% of the pre-purge water level Well gauging and <br /> purging field data is presented as Appendix C <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells using <br /> polyethylene bailers The samples were given the same designation as the well <br /> from which they were collected Samples were labeled, documented on a chain-of- <br /> D-107 PAR <br /> /RAP CRAP 4 February 21, 1996 <br />