My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006431
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DURHAM FERRY
>
4491
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544625
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006431
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2019 8:41:43 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 4:38:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006431
RECORD_ID
PR0544625
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003113
FACILITY_NAME
ZAPIEN MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
4491
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DURHAM FERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25504003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4491 W DURHAM FERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_. ----a$— ZZ,CLEARWATER <br /> • G R O U P, I ISI C <br /> If it is determined that the test was performed under confined aquifer <br /> conditions and enough time has elapsed for steady-state conditions to have <br /> been met (as defined in the literature), the Jacob distance-drawdown and <br /> time-drawdown methods (Cooper & Jacob, 1946) will generally be applied to <br /> evaluate storativity and transmissivity Alternatively, the Theis curve- <br /> fitting method (Theis, 1935) may be employed if steady-state conditions were <br /> not reached. In leaky aquifers, the Hantush method (Hantush, 1956) will <br /> generally be used <br /> The capture zone will also be determined using the transmissivity values <br /> obtained through the evaluation and following the method initially outlined <br /> by Janvandel and Tsang (1986). The data will then be used to determine the j <br /> construction and design specifications of the proposed system, based on the <br /> requirements of the system conceptual design (migration control, dewatering, <br /> plume capture) <br /> It must be g <br /> recognized that even using theoretical models for the data <br /> g <br /> evaluation, some judgement will be necessary in conducting the analyses and <br /> applying the calculated parameters to the system design Different types of <br /> aquifers may have similar drawdown or response behaviors, and this must be <br /> accounted for A complete explanation of the method used and the reasoning <br /> behind the choice of method and an analysis of the results will be presented <br /> with the data evaluation <br /> REFERENCES <br /> Boulton, N S (1954) The drawdown of the water table under nonsteady <br /> conditions near a pumped well in an unconfined formation Inst Civil <br /> Engrs , Proc , Vol. 3, p 564-579 <br /> Cooper, H H & Jacob, C E (1946) A generalized graphical method for <br /> evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history Am <br /> Geophys Union Trans Vol. 27, p 526-534. <br /> Creative Scientific Applications (1992-1994) The Aquifer Test Toolbox, <br /> Aquifer Test Worksheets for Hydrogeologists and Engineers Ver 10 , <br /> Wellsville, Penn <br /> Hantush, M.S (1956) Analysis of data from pumping tests in leaky aquifers <br /> J Geophys Res Vol. 64, p 1043-1052 <br /> Constant-Discharge Aquifer Test Page 4 of 5 December 16,1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.