Laserfiche WebLink
' Working To Restore Nature <br /> below surface grade, with a direction of flow toward the northeast and approximate hydraulic <br /> gradient of 0 001 Gasoline hydrocarbons have been detected in soil near the tank cavity and <br /> groundwater beneath the site Data collected from the three wells during previous monitoring <br /> ' events are presented in Table 1 In addition, water quality data for an onsite domestic water <br /> well are provided in Table 1 <br /> ' In October 1993, RESNA observed dnlling of three offsite (HP-2, HP-3 and HP-4) and three <br /> onsite soil borings (HP-1, HP-5, and HP-6) to groundwater (RESNA, January 26, 1994, Report <br /> 123020 01) Groundwater samples were collected from these bonngs using a Hydropunch <br /> ' sampling device RESNA also observed drilling of three additional soil borings onsite near the <br /> UST's (B-1, B-2, and B-3), these borings were converted to vapor extraction wells VW-1, VW- <br /> 2, and VW-3 Residual gasoline hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples obtained from <br /> ' borings B-1, B-2, and B-3, but were not detected in the other onsite or offsite borings. <br /> Dissolved gasoline hydrocarbons were not detected in groundwater from onsite or offsite <br /> ' borings <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING: SECOND QUARTER 1994 <br /> ' On June 9, 1994, a technician from RESNA measured the depth to water and subjectively <br /> analyzed groundwater samples from the three monitoring wells (Table 1) The technician <br /> observed sheen in wells MW-1 and MW-2 Groundwater samples were collected from well <br /> 1V-W-3 and the onsite supply well; wells MEW-1 and MW-2 were not sampled because they had <br /> product sheen Our field procedures are described in an attachment to this report <br /> ' The surveyed elevations and the depth to groundwater measurements, summarized in Table 1, <br /> were used to evaluate the potentiometnc surface beneath the site The groundwater flow <br /> ' direction on June 9, 1994, was generally to the southwest with the hydraulic gradient of <br /> approximately 0 005 (Plate 3) <br /> The water samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) using <br /> modified Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8015 and benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, and total xylene isomers (BTEX) using EPA Method 8020 The samples were <br /> ' analyzed at Sparger Technology, Inc. in Sacramento, California (Hazardous Waste Testing <br /> Laboratory Certificate No 1614) Results of analyses indicated TPHg and BTEX concentrations <br /> were below laboratory detection limits in well MW-3 and the supply well The results of <br /> ' analyses are summarized in Table i Copies of the laboratory Analysis Reports and Chain of <br /> Custody Record are attached <br /> 06211gou 123620.1 2 <br />