Laserfiche WebLink
CLEARWATER <br /> C, R0UP <br /> ERVIra-mental Services <br /> averaging approximately 2 lbs/hr during the first five months of operation However, by July 1999, <br /> contaminant recovery rates had decreased to approximately 0 02 lbs/hr For the last three months of <br /> operation, influent TPHg levels only slightly exceeded laboratory detection limits Calculations <br /> indicated the SVE/AS system recovered approximately 7,377 lbs (or 1,209 gals) of gasoline from the <br /> subsurface by the end of September 1999 The amount of contamination recovered from the subsurface <br /> compared well to that calculated to be in the subsurface prior to remediation, although slightly higher, <br /> indicating that the system had removed the vast majority of contaminants beneath the site <br /> Remediation efforts were also reflected by a marked decrease, over two orders of magnitude, in <br /> groundwater contaminants in the source area Prior to remediation, maximum concentrations of <br /> TPHg, benzene, and MTBE in groundwater had been 150,000 gg/L, 9,400 pg/L, and 3,800 pg/L, <br /> respectively Following shut-down of the remediation system, maximum TPHg, benzene, and MTBE <br /> concentrations in groundwater were only 990 pg/L, 13 pg/L, and 150 pg/L, respectively, in November <br /> 1999 Clearwater recommended shut-down of the SVE/AS system at the end of September 1999 because <br /> operational data indicated that it had reached a plateau in contaminant recovery The SJCPHS/EHD <br /> approved system shut-down in a letter dated September 20, 1999 In that letter, the SJCPHS/EHD <br /> indicated that groundwater beneath the site should continue to be monitored for several quarters to <br /> evaluate post-remediation trends in residual groundwater contaminants and that confirmation soil <br /> borings would be required in the future to demonstrate remediation of the vadose zone The mobile <br /> catalytic oxidizer was removed from the site in October 1999 However, all vapor extraction piping <br /> remains in the ground, and the above ground manifold was secured (Figure 2) <br /> In February 2000, Clearwater supervised the drilling of four confirmation soil borings (CB-1 through <br /> CB-4) The borings were drilled in areas of known soil contamination prior to remediation <br /> Comparison of pre- and post-remediation soil samples indicated that the SVE/AS system had <br /> effectively reduced gasolene contaminants in the vadose zone Based on the results of the confirmation <br /> soil samples, it appears that the last of the residual soil contamination exists at the bottom of the former <br /> south underground storage tank The 10 foot depth level in CB-1 corresponds to this location At this <br /> location, pre-remediation levels of gasoline in soil were X10,000 mg/kg The results from the samples <br /> in CB-1 indicate a past-remediation level of 230 mg/kg at this 10 foot depth level At the same depth, at <br /> the base of the former north underground storage tank pit, pre-remediation levels of gasoline in soil <br /> were also >10,000 mg/kg Results from the sample at 10 feet bgs in CB-2 indicate a post-remediation <br /> level of gasoline in soil of <1 mg/kg Prior to remediation the mass of TPHg in the vadose zone was <br /> estimated to be 5,050 lbs (842 gallons), however, based on confirmation sample results, post-remediation <br /> mass of TPHg in the vadose is estimated to be 37 lbs (6 gallons) This indicates that the SVE/AS system <br /> was effective at removing more than 99% of the gasoline from the soil column beneath the site <br /> Additionally, ongoing groundwater monitoring results indicated the limited residual dissolved-phase <br /> contaminant concentrations continued decrease following remediation Results of confirmation soil <br /> sampling were presented in Clearwater's Confirmation Soil Sampling, Groundwater Monitoring - First <br /> Quarter 2000, and Closure Request dated March 27, 2000 The SJCPHS/EHD responded to the closure <br /> ZB107C GWMR 2Q01 2 April 9 2001 <br />