My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
E
>
103
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544638
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2019 1:42:14 PM
Creation date
7/9/2019 1:31:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0544638
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004027
FACILITY_NAME
HENDRIX FORK LIFT INC
STREET_NUMBER
103
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
E
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15318001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
103 N E ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A. <br /> Messrs Trommer and Luton Now <br /> Preliminary Five-Year Review Letters 16 June 20p8 <br /> Various Sites Page 2 of 7 <br /> wells. The EHD is awaiting the groundwater extraction test report to comment on <br /> pump and treat; the absorbent appears to be for free product and has not been <br /> approved. <br /> 2500 Lodi Avenue, W. <br /> • CUF recommended site closure consideration. A DPE test was recently <br /> conducted on MW-3; a report of findings is anticipated in the near future with a <br /> closure report addressing vapor intrusion potential and comparison to Region li <br /> ESLs, <br /> 345 Yosemite Street, N <br /> • CUF recommended site closure consideration. The EHD does not agree with this <br /> recommendation at this time for the following reasons. The site has two UARs <br /> and separate site codes (503414 and 2216), but have been worked under one <br /> CUF Claim (#12858). The western former underground storage tank (UST) site is <br /> nearly ready for closure consideration, but recent review shows that the vertical <br /> extent of impacted groundwater has not been demonstrated. Also, a sand unit <br /> that is a potential contaminant migration pathway was not sampled toward the <br /> northwest. The EHD will direct that these data be acquired, The EHD also <br /> believes some attempt should be made to reduce the contaminant <br /> concentrations more rapidly, perhaps some batch groundwater extraction. <br /> • The eastern former UST site (case #503414) is not fully delineated laterally or <br /> vertically. Additional monitoring wells to complete the lateral and vertical <br /> assessment of the eastern UST is required. Following receipt of the report of <br /> monitoring well installations, assuming favorable analytical results, and sufficient <br /> quarterly monitoring of the new wells, this case may then be ready for closure <br /> consideration. As with the other case on the site, the EHD also believes some <br /> attempt should be made to reduce the contaminant concentrations more rapidly, <br /> perhaps some batch groundwater extraction. The RP will be directed to evaluate <br /> the potential benefit from some remediation for both cases. <br /> 15406 Tracy Blvd. <br /> • CUF recommended consideration for site closure; the EHD does not agree with <br /> this recommendation at this time. Vertical delineation of impacted groundwater is <br /> not complete; the onsite domestic well, screened between 76 and 96 feet bsg, is <br /> approximately 100 feet from impacted monitoring well MW-4. A work plan will be <br /> submitted in the near future to advance two geoprobe borings downgradient of <br /> MW-4 for lateral and vertical delineation and to perform a pumping test on MW-4; <br /> the EHD, in consultation with the CVRWQCB, believes this work should be <br /> completed before closure consideration. <br /> 757 Eleventh Street <br /> • CUF recommended evaluation of remedial technologies and potential for vapor <br /> intrusion. The EHD agrees with these recommendations, but notes that there <br /> were two UST systems with releases approximately 300 feet apart. The down- <br /> gradient and cross gradient extents of the dissolved plume centered on former <br /> 5-Year Review Comment Letter 061608.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.