My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006864
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
E
>
103
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544638
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006864
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2019 3:04:11 PM
Creation date
7/9/2019 1:51:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006864
RECORD_ID
PR0544638
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004027
FACILITY_NAME
HENDRIX FORK LIFT INC
STREET_NUMBER
103
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
E
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15318001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
103 N E ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> collect four soil samples from each 50 cubic yards of <br />' stockpiled soil, composite the groups of four soil samples, <br /> and analyze for TPHG and BTEX using a state-certified <br /> analytical laboratory <br /> dispose or treat excavated soil depending on volume <br /> excavated and petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations <br />' detected <br />' 3.2 Characterize Soil in the Vicinity of Tank E <br /> As documented previously, TPHD was detected in a soil sample collected <br />' at a depth of 10 feet in exploratory soil boring BH-1 (see Drawing 1). <br /> When tank E was excavated and removed, a confirmation soil sample was <br /> collected and analyzed for TPHG and BTEX. Toluene at a concentration of <br />' 0.0113 mg/kg was the only compound detected in the confirmation sam- <br /> ple. Because the confirmation sample was not analyzed for TPHD, there is <br /> still a question regarding possible diesel impact to soil beneath and adja- <br /> cent to the former location of tank E. EMCON Associates proposes exca- <br /> vating and segregating the soil used to backfill the tank excavation. The <br /> surface dimensions of the patch covering the tank excavation are reported <br /> to be 6 feet by 9 fleet. No depth is reported for the confirmation sample <br /> collected from the tank excavation for tank E. Based on the reported <br />' capacity of the tank (550 gallons) and typical burial depths for tanks of this <br /> capacity, EMCON Associates believes that the confirmation sample was <br /> collected at a depth of 10 feet. Based on the reported surface dimensions <br /> and an estimated depth of 10 feet for the excavation, EMCON Associates <br /> estimates that roughly 20 cubic yards of backfilled soil will be removed <br /> from the tank excavation. EMCON Associates is assuming that this soil is <br />' clean imported fill and that chemical characterization is not necessary. <br /> Once the fill material is excavated and stockpiled, EMCON Associates <br />' proposes overexcavating the bottom and sidewalls based on visual and <br /> olfactory evidence, and on testing of selected soil samples from the exca- <br /> vation using a field test kit. This field test kit is the Hanby Test Kit. Based <br /> on the results of the field test kit, confirmation soil samples from the bot- <br /> tom and sidewalls of the excavation will be submitted to a state-certified <br />' laboratory for analysis of TPHD. At a minimum, one soil sample will be <br /> collected for analysis from each of the four sidewalls and from the base of <br /> the excavation. <br /> piRf921f920201 a 6 Rev. 0 June 1, 1992 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.