Laserfiche WebLink
John Pestana QTIP., Trust -3= March 24, 2008 <br /> r,,�Ctaim 3484 # IfIfII <br /> C. Groundwater Trends t, <br /> Benzene trends are shown below <br /> Fv <br /> - t Claim 3484 <br /> 100 <br /> 80 TZ <br /> �- 60 <br /> w M W-1 <br /> N 40 .F - --rk—MW-2 <br /> d 20 € <br /> 0 <br /> CD 00, VOJ IS (D i r N C`7 � LD CD <br /> o o a <br /> o I, 0 <br /> 3 � 3 � �0 0 - <br /> ' C C C" ,,C- i) C C C C f) C C C <br /> Time <br /> 'p <br /> A <br /> VII. SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY: no wells identified within '/z mile of th'e;site <br /> VIII. COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> A. Site Description: retail gasoline station <br /> B. Site History: the extent ofgroundwater contamination is..marginally defined <br /> s <br /> C. Groundwater.Monitoring Summary: weak monitoring history <br /> D. Remediation Summary. none Identified <br /> E. Contaminant Exposure'Pathway Evaluation: unknown <br /> F. Recommendation: Based on the following criteria, the Fund recommends this } <br /> site be considered for closure providing the potential for soil vapor migration is <br /> assessed and determined safe for prescribed site activities, public participation <br /> and fee title notifications-are"conducted, and the monitoring wells are <br /> appropriately abandoned. <br /> The source of the UST release has been identified and removed. <br /> • Free-phase product it groundwater has been removed to the full extent <br /> practicable, in accordance with the UST Regulations (Title 23, CCR, <br /> Section 2655). <br /> • Contaminants remaining in the vadose zone cannot migrate in soil vapor <br /> or leach at concentrations that would cause groundwater_to exceed water <br /> quality objectives. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> P.a Recycled Paper <br />