Laserfiche WebLink
1 1� <br /> Working To Restore Nature <br /> Descriptions of soils encountered and monitoring well construction details were recorded on the <br /> boring/well log presented in Attachment 1 <br /> Soils encountered were monitored for organic vapors by placing a small amount of representative <br /> material in a sealed container, then measuring the concentration of volatiles collected in the head <br /> space of the container with a photoionization detector (PID) calibrated to the benzene molecule <br /> The values obtained at each measurement point were recorded on the boring logs --,0 evidence <br /> of soil"contamination was noted during drilling. ;Soil cuttings generated during the-drilling, <br /> process were contained on-site in a DOT approved 55-gallon drum <br /> Subsequent to installation, the monitoring well was developed using a pump and surge method <br /> Development water was contained in DOT 17H drums and is currently stored on site The well <br /> development log is included in Attachment 2 <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> Groundwater monitoring and sampling was conducted by RESNA personnel on September 20, <br /> 1993. Water level measurements were collected from each monitoring well prior to purging and <br /> sampling Water levels rose in wells MW3 and MW5 (nearest honker cut) and dropped in wells-' <br /> MW1, MW2 and MW4 since the last monitoring event in June 1993 (Table 1) A groundwater <br /> gradient map was created using the data collected on September 20, 1993 (Figure 3) <br /> Groundwater flows northeast, away from the slough, with a gradient of 0 067 feet/foot or <br /> approximately 354 feet per mile <br /> Subsequent to monitoring, each well was purged by extracting approximately 3 well casing <br /> volumes. While purging, the groundwater parameters (temperature, conductivity, and pH) were <br /> monitored and allowed to stabilize before water samples were collected Samples were collected <br /> using dedicated, disposable bailers with bottom emptying devices to reduce volatilization The <br /> samples were transported to and analyzed by state-certified Argon Mobile Labs in Ceres, <br /> California All purged groundwater was contained in DOT approved 55 gallon drums and <br /> remains on site pending appropriate disposal The well purge logs are included in Attachment <br /> 2 <br /> Samples were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) using EPA <br /> Method 8020, and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and total petroleum, <br /> hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) using modified EPA Method 8015 Monitoring well MW4 did <br /> not contain enough water to collect a sample for TPHd analysis ; Monitoring Wells MW1, <br /> MW2, and MW3 did not contain detectable concentrations of the petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> constituents Newly installed well,MW6 contained only toluene at 38 parts per billion (ppb) <br /> Monitoring wells MW4 and MW5 contained low to moderate levels of benzene, xylenes and <br /> TPHg TPHd was not detected _in _any _sample ' The lapproximate extent of dissolved <br /> contaminants (benzene) is shown on Figure 4 Analytical results are summarized in Table 2 <br /> Laboratory reports with chain-of-custody documents are included in Attachment 3 <br /> jProj Disk13QR-1993 FNL} 2 <br />