Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' detected in th(. up,trLan) ,Lit face water sample (DDN) collected fl(1111 thL drainage ditch located Last of thL "rte <br /> None of thL crthLr H 1 l X con,trtUents or I PI-[-(, wcrL deteLted it of abovL the laboratory reportLd detection <br /> Irrnrts in this ,ample. B I I X and FPH-(i were not deteLted in any of thL three iLmainirig surface water samples <br />' MT13E detected at or above the laboratory repeated detection limit rn all of the surface water Samples except <br /> the Sample LOHLUed him the viLinity of the, pump Rouse in the island drainage channel (1DCW) None of the <br /> remaining selected gasohrrL oxygenates/additi%cs wcrc. detected it of above. the laboratory reported detection <br />' Irmrt, in an-y Of the ,urtace water samples <br /> M flak- (20 fc`�,1) Nsa, the. oniv analyte detected at or above the laboratory reported detection limits in the marina's <br />' pre-treated dr:nkim, water ()III) Lhlorotorm bronlodichlorotnethane and dibromochlorontethane were detected <br /> in the manna , treated drinking water at or above. the laboratory reported detection limits (at concentrations of <br /> 18 6 1 and 3 0 rLspLctrvely) ( hloroform bromodichloromethanc and dibromochlorometlnane appear to <br /> be byproduct, of tlne mat Ina , drinking water treatment ,ystem <br /> Oil December 30 1998 ( ondoi LonduLted elu.srterly groundwater and surface water monitoring at Merman & <br /> Helen s Manna locatLd at VLnce lsldnd I Lrry in Stockton, California Laboratory analytical results indicated <br /> Ithat the gasoline oxygenate MTBF was detected in samples collected from monitor wells MW-I MW-2 MW-3, <br /> and MW-4 at LoncLritratiorns of 1 3 µg/l I 1 000 µg/l 3 500 pg/l, and 1 5 µg/l respectively Iertiary-butanol was <br />' detected in the groundwater samples collected from monitor wells MW-2 and MW-3 at concentrations of 150 <br /> µg/1 and 130 µg/I, respectively TAML' was detected in the groundwater samples collected from monitor wells <br /> MW-2 and M W-3 at concentrations of 37 µg/I and 8 3 gg/l, respectively None of the other oxygenates/additives <br /> were detected at or above the laboratory reported detection limits in any of the groundwater samples <br /> IToluene was detected rn thL groundwater sample collected from monitor well MW-2 at a Loncentration of 1 2 <br /> µg/1 BMA c._onstiterents were detected in the groundwater sample colleLted from monitor well MW-4 at <br /> concentrations of 24 fig/l 0 4 µg/I 2 3 lig./l and ?2 pg/1 respectivLly BTF'X constituents were not detected rn <br /> the groundwater samples collected from monitor wells MW-1 and IVIW-3 I PH-G was detected in the <br /> groundwater sample colleLted from monitor well MW-4 at a corrLentration of 2 mg/1 Z PH-CJ was not detected <br />' in the groundwater samples collected from monitor wells MW-1, MW-2, or MW-3 <br /> Intrinsic bioremediation testing was discontinued at the site following the third quarter, 1998, monitoring event <br /> because of Inconclu,ive results and because the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination at the Site is probably of <br /> secondary concern relative to the presence of gasoline oxygenates The intrinsic bioremediation testing results <br /> for the four quarters beginning with the Fourth quarter 1997 groundwater monitoring event and ending with the <br /> third quarter 1998 groundwater monitoring event indicated that subsurface conditions at the ,rte appeared to be <br /> conducive to the aerobic and/or anaerobic breakdown of petroleurn hydrocarbons However the re,ults did not <br /> conclusively indlLate that rnttinsic bioremediation was occurring at the site No well-defined differences in the <br />' intrinsic bioremediation parameters were established up-gradient (MW-1) in the plume center (MW-4), and <br /> down-gradient (MW-2 and MW-3) at the site I his may be in part related to tine relatively low concentrations of <br /> petioletun hydrocarbons prLsLnt at MW-4 and the very short residence time of groundwater in the soil at the site <br />' Groundwatet elevation measurements collected at the site on December 30, 1998, indicated that the average <br /> depth to groundwater was approximately 4 6 feet bgs which is approximately one-half foot higher than the <br /> I average groundwater elevation measured on September 30 1998 Groundwater elevation contours for December <br /> 30 1998 indtcated that the ground«atei madient at the site x%as generally consistent with that measured on <br /> September 18, 1997 December 31, 1997, March 27, 1998, June 26, 1998, and September 30, 1998 <br /> IBTEX and TPH-G were not detected at or above the laboratory reported detection limits in any of the surface <br /> . water samples Low concentrations of MTBE (1 4 and 1 0 µg/i) were detected in the upstream surface water <br /> Isample (DUN) and the downstream surface water sample (DDS), respectively None of the remaining selected <br />