Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' (iroiurdwatei LIL)-1t1On measurements collected at thy, site on JnnL 21 2000 indicated that the average depth to <br /> groundwater sxas ippinximately sig ILLt below the monitor well and water surface measuring points <br /> • (imundwatcr Llc\anuli contours for lune, 21 2000 indicate that tI1L groundwater gradient at the site is generally <br />' consistent with the historical groundwater gradient <br /> In a letter dated June. M 2000 Mr RowL (It the. ',an Joaquin County P11S/I'HD directed the submittal of a work <br />' plan airicndnicnt to modify the sLopc of wnrl. proposed in the ahovc refeienctcl work plan and work plan <br /> addendum \LLOrdtng to kir Rowe the woil. plait amendment was to desci ibe vertical character iration of the <br /> potential M 1131- plume and bt suhmitted by August 1 2000 ( ondor subsequently prepared the Stutus Report <br />' antl Ithh,whim if) thi itmk flora dated July- 2000 Mr Rowe, approved the work plan ainLndialent in a taxed <br /> MLssage dated Ausust 1 2000 [n a tLILphorsc conversation with Mr Rowe on August 3 2000 ( ondor <br /> requLsted that the submittal datL for the report of findings bL eYttnded to OLtober 6 2000 Mr RowL verbally <br />' concurred with the LXtension and rcqucsted that ( ondor prepare a letter to dOLUITient the, conversation ( ondor <br /> fo11UwLd up with a [ettcr dated August 1 2000 <br />' <br /> Me installation and sampling of the, soil borings described by the Work Plan Work Plan Addendum, and Work <br /> Plan Annendmcnt were conducted at the site between September I 1 and September 13 2000 The results of the <br /> investigation were described in the Soil and Groundwater Investigation and Sensitive Receptoi Suivey Report <br />' dated OctohU 2, 2000 Direct push ((,eoprohe), hand auger, and hollow-stem auger techniques were used to <br /> advance 13 borings at the site (Borings DP-1 through DP-9, SP-1 and HP-1 through HP-3) Soil sampling was <br /> conducted with direct push coring or Simulprobe techniques, as necessary Groundwater sampling was <br /> conducted with the direct push groundwater sampling tool (hydropunch style) The purpose of the work was to <br /> Ifurther investigate the Luent of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the east portion of the site and the <br /> propLr-ty (agricultuia] flLld) adjacent to the east portion of the site <br /> lie <br /> I aboratory analyt:cal results indicated that iM I BF was present in the soil Samples collected at approximately 4 <br /> feet bgs from DP-4 and at approximately 8 feet bgs from DP-5 at concentrations of 1,600 and 7,100 pg/Kg, <br /> respcetively IAMI was also present tri the soil sample collected at approximately 8 feet blas from DP-5 at a <br />' conLLritration of 180 pg/Kg None of the analytes of interest were detected at or above the laboratory reported <br /> detection limas in any of the soil samples collected trom DP-3, DP-6, DP-7, DP-8 <br /> Laboiatoty analytical results of the groundwater Samples indicated that an elevated concentration of MTBE <br /> (37,000 I1.011) was present in the shallow groundwater at the location of DP-5 Benzene, ethyl benzene, total <br /> xylenes I P11-(j and I AM[ wcrc also present at that location at concentrations of 330 fig/I 80 1rg/1, 1 10 pg/L, <br />' 1 7 ing/L and 130 [L-A i cspectrvely FPI-I-(� was present at a concentration of 0 28 mg/1 in the gi oundwater <br /> sample collected at approximately 24 feet bgs fiom HP-1 With the exception of these two groundwater samples, <br /> none, of the analytes of interest other than M I BI- were detected in any of the other grow ndwatei samples at or <br /> above the. laboratoi v i eported detection I units Ti ace to moderate concentrations of M`i BI-I ranging from 2 2 to <br /> 181 pg/L were detected in shallow groundwater samples collected from DP-1 DP-2, DP-3 DP-4 DP-6, DP-8, <br /> and DP-9 With the exception of a concentration of 5 4 pg/1 in the groundwater sample collected from <br />' approximately 31 feet bgs in HP-2, MTBE was not detected at of above the laboratory reported detection limit in <br /> any of the groundwater samples collected fiorn the deeper strata in HP-1, HP-2, and HP-3 <br />' Field observations indicated that the site soil present to the depth investigated generally consists of peat, very <br /> fine to fine-anaincd sand elate,, sand silt) sand sift} clay, and sand} clay The stratigraphy beloNN the peat at <br /> the site as observed in the three deep coittutuously cored borings (DP-3, DP-7, and DP-8) is tine-grained and <br /> complex with a relatively high degree of heterogeneity and anisotropy Sand, silt, and clay content alternate and <br /> vary frequently with an increase in depth The stratigraphy indicated in DP-7 correlates well with the <br /> . stratigraphy in DP-8 The stratigraphy indicated in DP-3, however, does not correlate as closely with that of DP- <br />' 7 and DP-8 rhes indicates that the various soil strata at the site are not laterally extensive but instead vary in <br /> composition within a relatively short distance The presence of a laterally and vertically extensive clay horizon <br />