| 
								     I
<br />											Herman&Helen.Manna--Third Quarter 1999 Groundwater Momtonng
<br />  																		October 26 1999
<br />   																			Page-2-
<br />    	TPI 1-G, B I FX constituents, M L m, tertiary butanol  and tertiary amyl methyl ether ( 1 AME) were detected in
<br />'  	some of the  soil  and groundwater samples collected during the  investigation  Groundwater elevation data
<br />    	indicated that groundwater flow at the site was probably controlled by the very active island drainage pumping
<br />    	system adjacent to the site    The above referenced report recommended quarterly groundwater monitoring.,
<br />    	surface water sampling,  and  Risk Based Corrective Action (RSCA) to further characterize the site and to
<br />    	evaluate options for remediation or site closure
<br />'  	In a telephone conversation on March 23,  1998, Mr  Ronald Rowe of the San Joaquin County Public Health
<br />    	Services/Environmental Health Department (PHS/EIID) indicated that, based on his review of the report dated
<br />    	December 11  1997 (referenced above), he was requesting that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue at the
<br />    	site   Purthermore, he requested that a work plan be prepared for conducting quarterly surface water sampling
<br />    	and additional investigation of the gasoline oxygenate/additive plume to the east of monitor well MW-2  Condor
<br />    	subsequently prepared the Work Plan —Additional Soil and Groundwater Investigation/Surface Water Sampling,
<br />    	dated May 27, 1998  In a faxed note dated June 1, 1998, Mr  Rowe approved the work plan with the stipulation
<br />    	that a work plan addendum be prepared describing installation of additional borings to those proposed in the
<br />    	work plan and grab sampling of the Kerman & Helen's Marina drinking water source   Condor subsequently
<br />    	prepared the Work Plan Addendum, dated July 9, 1998   In a fax dated July 27, 1998, Mr Ron Rowe approved
<br />    	the work plan addendum adding that both the facility pre-treated drinking water and the post-treatment water
<br />    	should be sampled and analyzed by appropriate methods
<br />    	On October 1, 1998, a Condor representative was on site to conduct quarterly surface water sampling activities
<br />    	and collect a sample of the marina's pre-treated and treated drinking water from the facility's water treatment
<br />    	system   On December 30, 1998, March 26, 1999, and June 30, 1999, Condor conducted quarterly groundwater
<br />   	and surface water sampling as part of the fourth quarter,  1998, first quarter  1999, and second quarter,  1999,
<br />    	monitoring, respectively   The installation and sampling of the soil borings described by the above referenced
<br />    	Work Plan and Work Plan Addendum is pending receipt of site access authorization from off-site property
<br />   	owners  A comprehensive site background is included in Appendix B
<br />   	3   THIRD QUARTER, 1999, GROUNDWATER MONITORING
<br /> I3.1  FIELD METHODOLOGY
<br />   	On  September 23,  1999, a Condor representative was on site to conduct quarterly groundwater monitoring
<br />   	activities   The monitoring activities included measurement of water levels in the site monitor wells and at
<br />   	surface water measurement stations and the collection of groundwater samples from the monitor wells   All field
<br />   	equipment was decontaminated in the field with a solution of laboratory-grade, non-phosphate detergent and
<br />   	hydrocarbon-free water and rinsed with hydrocarbon-free water prior to use in each well   All field instruments
<br /> I  	were calibrated to the manufacturer's recommended standards  The water level in each well was measured to the
<br />   	nearest 0 01 foot with a battery-operated, flat-tape, water-level meter   A new, disposable, polyethylene bailer
<br />   	was lowered into each well to collect afield-inspection sample   The bailer sample was inspected for floating
<br />   	product, sheen, discoloration and/or odor   Floating product or sheens were not observed in the groundwater
<br />   	removed from any of the monitor wells during the groundwater sampling   A slight petroleum hydrocarbon odor
<br />   	was noted in the groundwater recovered from MW-2    Petroleum hydrocarbon odors were not noted in the
<br />'  	groundwater samples collected from monitor wells MW-1, MW-3, and MW-4
<br />   	The purging and sampling sequence for the monitor wells was MW-1, MW-4, MW-3, and MW-2   Each well
<br />   	was purged with a new, disposable, polyethylene bailer until three well-casing volumes of water had been
<br />   	removed and the electrical conductivity, pH, and temperature of the water had stabilized  The purge water was
<br />   	discharged to 55-gallon drums and left on site to await disposal    Groundwater Monitoring Field Forms are
<br />   	included in Appendix C
<br />    La    																	CONDOR
<br />
								 |