My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006995
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EIGHT MILE
>
15135
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518132
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 7:48:47 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 11:49:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006995
RECORD_ID
PR0518132
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0013716
FACILITY_NAME
H & H MARINA
STREET_NUMBER
15135
STREET_NAME
EIGHT MILE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95219
APN
06908021
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
15135 EIGHT MILE RD
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Hr.rrnaD& IIL[Cn s Manna-1-irst Quarter 1999 Groundwater Monitorutg <br /> April 15 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> TPH-G RTEX e.an5tituents, MTBE tertiary butanol, and tertiary amyl methyl ether (1 AME) were detected in <br /> some of the soil and groundwater samples collected during the investigation Groundwater elevation data <br /> indicated that groundwater flow at the site was probably controlled by the very active island drainage pumping <br /> system adjacent to the site The above referenced report recommended quarterly groundwater monitoring, <br /> surface water sampling, and Risk Based Corrective Action (RBCA) to further characterize the site and to <br /> evaluate options for remediation or site closure <br /> In a telephone, conversation on March 23, 1998 Mr Ronald Rowe of the San Joaquin County Public Health <br /> Services/Environmental Health Department (PIIS/EHD) indicated that, based on his review of the report dated <br /> December 1 1 1997 (referenced above), lie was requesting that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue at the <br /> site Furthermore, lie requested that a work pian be prepared for conducting quarterly surface water sampling <br /> and additional investigation of the gasoline oxygenate/additive plume to the east of monitor well MW-2 Condor <br /> subsequently prepared the Work Plan — 4dditronal Soil and Groundwater InvestigationlSurface Water Sampling <br /> dated May 27, 1998 In a faxed note dated June 1, 1998, Mr Rowe approved the work plan with the stipulation <br /> that a work plan addendum be prepared describing installation of additional borings to those proposed in the <br /> work plan and grab sampling of the Herman & Helen's Marina drinking water source Condor subsequently <br />' prepared the Work Plan Addendum, dated July 9, 1998 In a fax dated July 27, 1998, Mr Ron Rowe approved <br /> the work plan addendum adding that both the facility pre-treated drinking water and the post-treatment water <br /> should be sampled and analyzed by appropriate methods <br />' On October 1, 1998, a Condor representative was on site to conduct quarterly surface water sampling activities <br /> and collect a sample of the marina's pre-treated and treated drinking water from the facility's water treatment <br /> system On December 30, 1998, Condor again conducted quarterly surface water sampling as part of the fourth <br /> quarter, 1998, monitoring The installation and sampling of the soil borings described by the above referenced <br /> Work Plan and Work Plan Addendum is pending receipt of site access authorization from off-site property <br /> owners A comprehensive site background is included in Appendix B <br /> 3. FIRST QUARTER, 1999,GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 3 1 FIELD METHODOLOGY <br /> On March 26, 1999, a Condor representative was on site to conduct quarterly groundwater monitoring activities <br /> The monitoring activities included measurement of water levels in the site monitor wells and at surface water <br /> measurement stations and the collection of groundwater samples from the monitor wells All field equipment <br />' was decontaminated in the field with a solution of laboratory-grade, non-phosphate detergent and hydrocarbon- <br /> free water and rinsed with hydrocarbon-free water prior to use in each well All field instruments were calibrated <br /> to the manufacturer's recommended standards The water level in each well was measured to the nearest 0 01 <br /> foot with a battery-operated, flat-tape, water-level meter A new, disposable, polyethylene bailer was lowered <br /> into each well to collect a field-inspection sample The bailer sample was inspected for floating product, sheen, <br /> discoloration and/or odor Floating product or sheens were not observed in the groundwater removed from any <br /> of the monitor wells during the groundwater sampling Petroleum hydrocarbon odors were not noted in the <br /> groundwater samples collected from the four monitor wells <br /> The purging and sampling sequence for the monitor wells was MW-1, MW-3, MW-2, and MW-4 Each well <br /> was purged with a new, disposable, polyethylene bailer until three well-casing volumes of water had been <br /> removed and the electrical conductivity, pH, and temperature of the water had stabilized The purge water was <br /> discharged to 55-gallon drums and left on site to await disposal Groundwater Monitoring Field Forms are <br /> included in Appendix C <br /> A groundwater sample was collected from each well by filling a new, disposable, polyethylene bailer with <br /> groundwater and transferring the groundwater to two 40-milliliter glass vials fitted with Teflon-lined The <br /> 4F% 4%Nft <br /> It, CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.