My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006998
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EIGHT MILE
>
15135
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518132
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 3:19:11 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 11:50:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006998
RECORD_ID
PR0518132
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0013716
FACILITY_NAME
H & H MARINA
STREET_NUMBER
15135
STREET_NAME
EIGHT MILE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95219
APN
06908021
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
15135 EIGHT MILE RD
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Based on the results of the Geoprobc investigation, Condor recommended that monitor wells be installed at the <br /> site to investigate and monitor the lateral extent of the gasoline and diesel contamination plume (reference - Soil <br /> and Gtoundwatei Investigation Report, prepared by Condor, dated September 30, 1996) Mr Ronald Rowe of the <br /> PHS/h1ID approved the proposal for the monitor well installation in correspondence to Condor, dated February 6, <br />' 1997 Condor subsequently prepared the Work Plan for Monitor Well Installation, dated May 30, 1997 As <br /> described in Section 1 0 of this report, the Work Plan was approved by the PHS/EHD and the Reclamation District <br /> in July, 1997 <br />' In accordance with the work plan, Condor conducted an additional soil and groundwater investigation on <br /> September 10, 15, and ltd, 1997, at the site I our monitor wells were dnlled, installed, developed, surveyed, and <br />' sampled as part of the investigation I he Reporl Additional Soil and Gi oundivalel Invc wtgatton, dated <br /> December 11, 1997, was prepared by Condor describing the investigation results <br />' <br /> Laboratory analysis of the soil samples indicated that total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as kerosene diesel, <br /> and motor oil (TNPH), ethanol, tertiary butanol, DIP[~, PTB1 and (TAMF) were not detected at or above the <br /> laboratory reported detection limits in any of the samples collected from the monitoring wells during the <br /> September, 1997, sampling event BTI~X, FPH-G, and M'1131• were not detected at or above the laboratory <br /> reported detection limits in the soil sample collected from MW 1 at a depth of six feet bgs Benzene, ethyl benzene <br />' and xylene were not detected at or above the laboratory reported detection limits in the soil sample collected from <br /> MW-2 at a depth of four feet bgs Toluene, TPH-G and MTBh were detected in the soil sample collected from <br />' MW-2 at a depth of four feet bgs (16 µg/kg, 1 2 mg/kg and 1,300 ug/kg, respectively) Benzene and toluene were <br /> not detected at or above the raised laboratory reported detection limit in the soil sample collected from MW4 at a <br />' depth of six feet bgs MTBE was not detected at or above the laboratory reported detection limit in the sample <br /> collected from MW4 at a depth of six feet Fthyl benzene, xylene and TPH-G were detected in the soil sample <br /> t collected from MW4 at a depth of six feet(680 µg/kg, 6,000 4/kg, and 28 mg/kg, respectively) Laboratory results <br /> of the soil samples are presented in Table B 5, on the next page <br /> 1 <br />' L� CON13OR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.