Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> ^^u.~ �^~~'^~~�'~ /~~~~~ <br /> I <br /> '*^^' <br /> ~~ "^ <br /> TAB%.E3.1 <br /> Analytical Methods <br /> Groundwater 10.0 mg/kg (motor oil)_ <br /> CONSTITUENT METHOD= DETECTION LIMIT <br /> Soil <br /> NN <br /> 1),5 nigil (motor oil) <br />� <br />--�� <br /> 4.0 lNA/2ST{GAT ON'RE5ULT8 <br />� 4.1 Field Obsen-at|ons / Site Gm}ug-y' <br />� <br /> Field nbscn/o1inns made during the investigation included visual observations pertaining to site <br /> ,cn\ogy and the detection n[petroleum 6v6rocorbons 6, d�c 0V�� und/or hv odor. OVA <br />-- rncuuurczncnto and the presence or absence of petroleum hydrocarbon odor are noted on boring logs <br /> for the monitor xeUs, included in Appendix B of this report. <br /> The material encountered during drilling ofthe monitor wells included nUq- sand fill and . <br /> m� <br /> native *"U consisting of silt), peat. Native soil was encountered at approximately 5.5 feet bgs in MW- <br /> l. Native soil was encountered at the ground surface in monitor vvd|n K8VV-2, MW-3, and MVV-4. <br /> The static depth to gpoundvvutu, `vas approximately 6. 4.5, and 4.5 ft box in K1W'1, MW-2L <br /> N� <br /> and MVV'3. respectively. MW-4 was dry at the time of drilling. Field observations during the drilling <br /> indicated that groundwater was present in the subsurface around MW-4 but was filling dlo honcholc so <br /> slowly that the static depth to gnouodvvu1ur oou|d not be determined. Rccuuoc of the very uho}|nv/ <br /> gruuodv,utcr at the site. u soil sample was collected from each boring at vvha\ was expected to be the <br />~~ <br /> cowmOp <br />�� <br />