My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
141
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507909
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2019 9:58:21 AM
Creation date
7/11/2019 9:35:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0507909
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007832
FACILITY_NAME
WEBER BLOCK AREA 9
STREET_NUMBER
141
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13909002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
141 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> Precision is the degree of mutual agreement between or among independent measurements of <br /> a similar property (standard deviation [SD] or relative percent difference [RPD]). This indicator <br /> relates to the analysis of duplicate laboratory or field samples. <br /> Completeness is expressed as the data actually obtained compared to amount that was expected <br /> to have been obtained. Due to,'a variety of circumstances, sometimes not all samples collected „ <br /> can be analyzed. The percent of completed analyses required will depend on the sampling design <br /> and data use. Expectation of completeness should be higher the fewer the number of samples <br /> taken per event or site. <br /> Representativeness is the expression of the degree to which data accurately and precisely <br /> represent a characteristic of an'environmental condition or a population. It relates both to the <br /> area of interest and to the method of taking the individual sample. The idea of representativeness <br /> should be incorporated into discussions of sampling design. The representativeness of data will <br /> be ensured by the use of established field and laboratory procedures and their consistent <br /> application. <br /> Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another. <br /> The use of standard, published methods allows the data to be compared to data from other <br /> projects; using the same methods throughout allows for comparison of data within a project. The <br /> comparability of all data collected will be assisted by reporting each data type in consistent units. <br /> All depths, elevations, and distances will be presented in English units. Chemical data will be <br /> reported in parts per billion (micrograms per liter [ug/1]) for water samples and parts per billion <br /> } (micrograms per kilogram [ug/kg]) or parts per million (milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg]) for <br /> soil, wood, and sediment samples. <br /> 6 <br /> Data Quality Indicators: Accuracy, precision, and completeness goals for the major chemical <br /> analyses to be performed on samples collected for the Weber Block site are presented in Table <br /> t 5-1. The actual precision and accuracy of the chemical data collected will be calculated by the <br /> laboratory at the conclusion of.the field work. If the data do not meet the goals prescribed in <br /> Table 5-1, they will be retained; but so noted in any reports they are represented. The precision <br /> of data reported at or near detection limits may in many cases be low (i.e., relative percent <br /> difference (RPD) exceeds Table 5-1 goals), even though the°data-may be acceptable. For <br /> example, duplicate values of 0.2 parts per billion and 0.9 ppb would result in an "unacceptable" <br /> RPD of 127 percent. Therefore, the precision goals in Table 5-1 are stated as appropriate for <br /> results at least 10 times greater'I'than the detection limits. <br /> 5.3 Data Management <br /> Data collected will be appropriately identified in the Phase 2 Investigation Report and 10% of <br /> the samples may be validated, if necessary. Where test data have been reduced, the method of <br /> reduction will be described in the text of such report. Entry of any data to computer databases <br /> will be checked by cross reading hard copy data files with the data in its. original form. <br />{ Validation of data obtained form field measurements will'be performed by checking procedures <br /> nA362IOMSAMwebsap2mp5 WEBER':BLOCK (Area 9) Sampling and Analysis Plan 0 <br /> Page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.