My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012678
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
141
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544645
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012678
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2019 12:40:53 PM
Creation date
7/11/2019 10:11:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012678
RECORD_ID
PR0544645
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004979
FACILITY_NAME
CIVIC CENTER PARKING*
STREET_NUMBER
141
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13909002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
141 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-a -ME <br /> tom* <br /> Criterion 9: <br /> The three alternatives are all comparable in terms of impacts upon <br /> water conservation. <br /> Based on the nine criteria discussed above, soil remediation using <br /> vapor extraction is the proposed remediation alternative at the site. <br /> V ile excavation approaches will, be effective in mitigating the <br /> ,impacts of hydrocarbon impacted soils, the vapor extraction approach <br /> t•, is capable of removing hydrocarbons that may have migrated beneath <br /> the sidewalk on the east side of the property. Excavation would not <br /> be feasible in this area due to the roadway. The most important <br /> factors in selecting vapor extraction in lieu of a sail removal <br /> approach are as follows: <br /> a. The geological setting at the site is favorable for vapor <br /> extraction and this approach is significantly more cost <br /> effective. <br /> b. Soil removal results in the release of more hydrocarbons to <br /> the environment due to the process of excavationand <br /> stockpiling. During this process it is impossible to <br /> prevent the natural volatilization of the gasoline <br /> constituents. Additionally, these constituents may be <br /> dispersed by wind, or precipitation. <br /> c. The soil excavation approaches are significantly more <br /> difficult to implement since additional measures are <br /> f.. required to protect structures on the site including the <br /> ! ' roadways, sidewalks and channel bulkheads. The excavation <br /> will also result in more business disruption, more traffic <br /> in the area and the production of a significant quantity of <br /> ` waste asphalt, concrete and other materials which would <br /> .. require disposal. <br /> d. Vapor extraction will result in controlled destruction of <br /> the hydrocarbon constituents with lesser release to the <br /> environment. <br /> .v, <br /> 6.0 PROPOSED SOIL REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN <br /> t The objective of the remediation-_prograZ-i3-_to_13wer-the-levels--of - - -- --- ---- <br /> '~ gasoline hydrocarbons in soils at the site to levels acceptable for <br /> closure by the overseeing regulatory agencies. The, results' of the <br /> vapor extraction test and the site specific hyd.rogeologic.. data <br /> Weber Point PrcParty - 475 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.