My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012678
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
141
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544645
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012678
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2019 12:40:53 PM
Creation date
7/11/2019 10:11:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012678
RECORD_ID
PR0544645
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004979
FACILITY_NAME
CIVIC CENTER PARKING*
STREET_NUMBER
141
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13909002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
141 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w <br /> at - <br /> I <br /> l <br /> The data pitted on Figure 6 were used to evaluate tYe well <br /> performance. The drawdown in a pumped well consists of two <br /> components, the aquifer losses and the well losses. The aquifer <br /> losses are related to laminar flow conditions and vary linearly with <br /> the pumping rate. The well losses include. head loss which varies <br /> both linearly and non-linearly with well discharge rate. The linear <br /> well losses are generally related to aquifer damage during well <br /> construction. The non-linear (non-darcy) well losses are related to <br /> turbulent flow within the well screen, the discharge pipe and the <br /> terized by the <br /> formation. These two components can be charac <br /> following equation. <br /> S AQ + BOP <br /> where: <br /> AQ = linear head losses, <br /> - $Q = non-linear head lasses, <br /> s = drawdown at a given time, <br /> 0 - discharge rate, <br /> P e a discharge rate--dependent value <br /> between 1.5 and 3.5, and <br /> A an B are constants. <br /> P. value of 2 for P is commGnly accepted in this ewiation (Ramey, <br /> 1962), which yields the equation: <br /> s <br /> s AQ + B02, <br /> or dividing by Q, <br /> s/Q = A + B0 <br /> n., <br /> The latter equa�ton represents a straight line on an s/Q versus Q <br /> plot (Figure 6). it can be seen that the data points on Figure G <br /> fall on a linear trend. Using the approach outlined in Todd (19$0, <br /> '- p. 355), the data indicate a very significant non-darcy (non-linear) <br /> component of the drawdown. This non-linear component of the head <br /> loss includes some effects related to well slots (Krusemann and de <br /> rcidder, 1989). A further indication of the excessive well losses in <br />'- ---- the well._-i is-Indicated recovery for the_. well MW5 after pumping was <br /> -- - - -- <br /> halted. This data shows extremely rapid_--recovery-(over 90*.. o -total-------- - -- -- - <br /> drawdown in the first iQ minutes) which is characteristic of wells <br /> with wellbore and near wellbore head losses due to turbulent flow. <br /> 3 <br /> L. weber Point PrepertP. 175, - 7 <br /> H2OR"791.TLP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.