Laserfiche WebLink
W. r <br /> N aquifer thickness at the pumping well and would result in the <br /> abnormally large drawdown observed (Krusemann and de Ridder,, 1989). <br /> The interpretation of the pumping test data from the site yields the <br /> following conclusions: <br /> • The aquifer beneath the subject property is heterogeneous, <br /> anisotropic and probably unconfined. A typical ;. <br /> transmssivity within the shallow zone is approximately ' <br /> 1000--8000 gallons per dad* per foot (gp3/ft. ). Typical: <br /> storage coefficients within the shallow water bearing zone; <br /> (35-50 ft below grade) are 0.005 to 0.01. No aquifer! <br /> boundaries are present in the immediate area. <br /> • The production well used for testing, MWS, exhibited verb <br /> high non-linear head loss-3s. This results in extremely iocr <br /> well efficiencies at higher discharge rates. <br /> To provide preliminary design specifications for tide rerrediatiou <br /> system the theoretical steady state capture zone assoc:isted with <br /> various pumping scenarios was calculated. The evaluation wag <br /> conducted using the following hydrologic parameters: (1) porosity, n <br /> of the saturated sediments is 30-W, (2) the average hydrauli, <br /> gradient, i, is ,005, (3) the transmissivi.ty, T, is-3000 gallons per `. <br /> day per foot, (4) the hydraulic conductivity, K, of the zone from 35_ <br /> to 50 feet below grade is 27 feet per day, and (5) the thickness c,f <br /> the saturated zone, b; is 15 feet. <br /> -" The presence of gasoline hydrocarbons in the downgradient well EKifL4 <br /> suggest the dissclved hydrocarbon plume mayhave migrated sortie. <br /> distance off-site in that direction. however, it is not unusual fcx <br /> monitoring wells to detect hydrocarbons during initial sampling which c. <br /> are introduced by the drilling process. Confirmation sampling will <br /> be performed prior to assessing the significance of these levels. <br /> The levels of dissolved hydrocarbons drop significantly in thzti <br /> ,a downgradient 3irec-cion with concentrations decreasing by over 70$ in t <br /> the 50 feet between MW3 and MW4. None of the gasoline constituent' j <br /> for which state maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) have beer! <br /> established were exceeded in the initial sample from MW4. <br /> Although it is not anticipated that contaminants have moved across El <br /> Dorado Street this possibility will be addressed after reviewing the ; <br /> results of second round sampling. Off-site investigation and/or <br /> remediation, if necessary, will be proposed at that time.,: <br /> Additionally, there is the potential that other sources of petroleum `, . <br /> hydrocarbons are present downgradient of the site. These potential. <br /> sources should be considered prior to any off site work. <br /> _J <br /> websr.Point Property - 475 - <br /> H20RAP791.YLP <br /> - - 1. <br />