My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
308
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544650
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2019 1:54:53 PM
Creation date
7/11/2019 11:52:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544650
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003520
FACILITY_NAME
DENS AUTO REPAIR INC
STREET_NUMBER
308
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
149063301
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
308 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N%w <br /> Den's Auto Repair Page 2 <br /> 308 South EI Dorado Street August 30, 2011 <br /> Stockton, California 95203 <br /> to target the high concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants detected at this <br /> depth interval. Upon meeting the CVRWQCB requirements for a WDR permit, please <br /> submit a boring permit application, and application/inspection fees to the EHD for the four <br /> well installations. <br /> Although significant concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants have been <br /> detected in shallow soil collected near the former underground storage tanks (USTs) and in <br /> groundwater collected from monitoring well MW-213, screened between 25 and 45 feet bsg, <br /> this pilot study does not address petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants detected in these <br /> areas. Based on the results from this pilot study, it may be necessary to redesign the ozone <br /> system to effectively address these areas of contamination. <br /> AGE states that the ozone injection rates, frequency, and duration will be based on the <br /> manufacturer's recommendations and adjusted based on site conditions during the pilot test. <br /> Include in the pilot study report of findings an estimate of the total ozone mass expected to <br /> be required to effectively remediate the petroleum contaminants at this site, taking into <br /> consideration the anticipated radius of influence of injected ozone based on site lithology <br /> and depth of sparging points, and the loss of ozone to subsurface reactions unrelated to <br /> petroleum contamination oxidation. Such reactions are evident at this site by the increasing <br /> concentrations of total and hexavalent chromium, bromate, vanadium, molybdenum, <br /> selenium, antimony, and arsenic reported by AGE in Ozone Bench Scale Test Report, dated <br /> 26 October 2010. <br /> During the advancement of the four ozone injection sparge wells, AGE proposes to select <br /> soil samples for analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g); benzene, <br /> toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX); methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and general minerals. During the pilot study, AGE proposes to <br /> collect groundwater samples monthly from MW-1A and MW-2A and analyze for TPH-g, <br /> BTEX, MTBE, 1,2-DCA, and metals. AGE also proposes to analyze groundwater from <br /> select wells for chromium, bromate and bromide, based on the well locations related to the <br /> ozone sparge wells, and monthly monitor groundwater from MW-1 and MW-2 for dissolved <br /> oxygen, oxygen reduction potential and depth to water. The EHD directs that all minerals <br /> and metals required by the CVRWQCB for their WDR permit be included in the analytical list <br /> and all groundwater constituents be reported below the maximum contaminant levels <br /> (MCLs) established by the California Environmental Protection Agency. <br /> The EHD directs that a human health risk assessment be performed. Residual contaminant <br /> concentrations should be compared to Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) established <br /> by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, for gross contamination <br /> and direct exposure, and California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs) published by <br /> the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection <br /> Agency. Residual contaminant concentrations that exceed any screening levels should then <br /> be evaluated in a Tier 2 risk assessment to determine if the site will qualify as a low-risk site. <br /> In addition, the potential risk from vapor intrusion should be evaluated. If additional data are <br /> needed to prepare a reliable vapor intrusion evaluation, submit a work plan to collect soil <br /> gas samples to the EHD by 31 October 2011. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.